Superlobbyist Nick Muzin on Intense Political Campaign Management 
Huawei’s AI Chip Struggles: 7nm Tech Falls Generations Behind NVIDIA Due to US Sanctions, TSMC Blockade 
Trump to Slash Biden's EV Push: Fuel-Efficiency Standards and Tax Credits on the Chopping Block 
South Korea’s $36K Crypto Tax Threshold Sparks 2025 Battle: 20% Gains Levy in the Crossfire 
Analyst Sounds Alarm: S&P 500 and Nasdaq Set to Dive as Sell Signals Emerge 
Bitcoin Continues To Dominate The Crypto Market, Just 10% Away From $100K 
Shiba Inu’s 14.84 Trillion Surge: Are Whales Quietly Shaping SHIB’s Next Big Move? 
Ram’s First Electric Pickup Delayed Again: 1500 REV Aims to Redefine EV Trucks in 2025 
Clinton and Yellen Stand Against Trump's Budget Ax: 'The CDFI Fund Must Be Preserved at All Costs' 
Trump Names Crypto Champion Howard Lutnick as Commerce Secretary, Signaling Digital Shift 
Federal Workers Fear Mass Firings as Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy Promise Government Overhaul: 'Billions Could Be Cut!' 
Shiba Inu Scam Warning Shocks Community: Fraudsters Use Fake Tokens to Exploit Shibarium Enthusiasts 
Vladimir Putin’s Russia Declares War on Crypto Mining With Siberian Energy Limits and Tax Rules 
Nvidia Drives S&P 500 Gains as AI Enthusiasm Climbs Amid Rising Russia-Ukraine Nuclear Tensions 
Bitcoin Hits $80,000 - Why Trump is Boosting Crypto? 
NEW YORK, May 02, 2017 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of investors who purchased Amyris, Inc. ("Amyris") (NASDAQ:AMRS) securities between March 2, 2017 and April 17, 2017.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/amyris-inc?wire=3. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) in the first quarter of 2017, Amyris made a decision to take an equity stake in one of Blue California’s affiliates that focused on the sweetener market in lieu of cash payment under the license agreement; (2) consequently, due to Amyris’ decision, Amyris would be unable to recognize $10 million in fourth quarter and fiscal year 2016 revenue from the license agreement with Blue California; and (3) as a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you suffered a loss in Amyris you have until June 19, 2017 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra-sa/amyris-inc?wire=3.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT: Vincent Wong, Esq. 39 East Broadway Suite 304 New York, NY 10002 Tel. 212.425.1140 Fax. 866.699.3880 E-Mail: [email protected]
