Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools 
Argentina Unions Rally Against Milei’s Labor Reform as Congress Debates Key Bill 
Trump Announces $1,776 Cash Bonus for U.S. Military Personnel Ahead of Christmas 
Trump Attends Dover Ceremony Honoring U.S. Personnel Killed in Syria 
UN Warns Gaza Humanitarian Aid at Risk as Israel Registration Rules Threaten NGO Operations 
Syria, Kurds and U.S. Race to Show Progress on SDF Integration Deal 
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade 
Kennedy Center Reportedly Renamed Trump-Kennedy Center After Board Vote 
Italy Supreme Court Upholds Salvini Acquittal in Migrant Kidnapping Case 
U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration 
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal 
U.S. and China Push for Ceasefire as Thailand–Cambodia Border Clashes Escalate 
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review 
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency 
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C. to Continue 
EU Delays Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Signing Amid Ukraine War Funding Talks 
One of the figures that have been caught up in the long-ranging case surrounding the Capitol insurrection is Republican Rep. Mo Brooks, who was seen at the rally of disgraced former President Donald Trump hours before the riots. This week, the Justice Department refused to defend Brooks in a lawsuit stemming from the insurrection.
Reuters reports that in a court filing made Tuesday, the DOJ said that it will not defend Brooks in a lawsuit filed against him by Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell. The lawsuit filed by Swalwell alleged that Brooks was also involved in the conspiracy to instigate the insurrection that left five people dead and dozens of police officers severely injured.
Brooks demanded that the DOJ represent him in the suit, citing that he would be covered by the Westfall Act, which protects federal employees from being sued or actions they have taken as part of their jobs. However, the DOJ said that Brooks’ appearance at the rally on January 6 was a campaign activity and is not part of his duties as a congressman. The House of Representatives Counsel has also refused to defend Brooks.
The DOJ’s refusal to defend Brooks in the lawsuit suggests that it may do the same for Trump, whose refusal to accept his election loss and constant peddling of the false election fraud claims culminated in the riots. Trump is also one of the defendants in Swalwell’s lawsuit.
“Members of Congress are subject to a host of restrictions that carefully distinguish their official functions on the one hand, and campaign functions on the other,” said the DOJ in the filing. “Inciting or conspiring to foment a violent attack on the United States Congress is not within the scope of employment of a Representative -- or any federal employee -- and thus is not the sort of conduct for which the United States is properly substituted as a defendant under the Westfall Act.”
The House Select Committee tasked with investigating the Capitol insurrection held its first hearing this week with some of the injured police officers. With the committee holding subpoena powers, former federal prosecutor Nick Ackerman said that any politician that worked with the right-wing militias during the attack should be worried.
Ackerman explained on MSNBC that if there are House members that coordinated with right-wing extremist groups Three Percenters, the Proud Boys, or the Oath Keepers, they would be exposed and prosecuted.
