Trump Administration Prepares Sanctions Against Entire ICC 
Maduro, Wife May Face New US Torture Charges 
CFTC Moves to Set New Crypto Rules After CLARITY Act Failure 
Judge Blocks Trump Election Conditions on Counterterrorism Grants 
Judge Orders Trump to Restore White House Access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico 
UK Sanctions Crypto Exchanges Linked to Russia 
US Treasury Drops Crypto Wallet Tracking Plan 
OpenAI, Anthropic Back Mandatory AI Breach Reporting in Australia 
TikTok Accused of Testing Fake Safety Tools on Users 
DaVoice Sues Perplexity AI Over Trade Secrets 
Trump Orders Firing Squad Execution for Fort Hood Gunman 
Israel Tightens Pilot Security After Flydubai Incident 
SEC Investor Reform Validates Barry Silbert’s Tokenization Vision 
San Francisco Halts New Data Center Construction With 45-Day Moratorium 
US, EU Push for Action Against Asia’s Excess Factory Capacity 
US Waives $320M Egypt Military Aid Conditions After Iran War Role 
Add as a preferred source on Google
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
