Trump Tells Congress Iran Hostilities Restarted, Citing New 60-Day War Powers Window 
Amy Coney Barrett Faces Conservative Backlash After Key Supreme Court Rulings Against Trump 
EU to Propose New Rules Limiting Children's Access to Social Media 
HHS Watchdog Reports $5.56 Billion in Healthcare Fraud Recoveries as Enforcement Actions Decline 
DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Journalists Over Air Force One Leak Report 
Trinidad Businessman Dominic Hadeed Appeals Detention Over Alleged Assassination Plot 
New Mexico AG Accuses DOJ of Delaying Jeffrey Epstein Ranch Investigation 
DOJ Grand Jury Investigates UAW President Shawn Fain Ahead of Union Election 
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Launches Task Forces to Overhaul U.S. Monetary Policy Framework 
Reuters/Ipsos Poll: Most Americans Expect U.S.-Iran War to Be Prolonged 
Venezuela Appoints Felix Plasencia to Lead Foreign Relations and Trade 
Fortescue Faces Class Action Over Sexual Harassment Claims at Australian Mining Sites 
Apple Challenges India Antitrust Probe, Says CCI Copied Rivals’ Claims in App Store Case 
Iraq PM Visits Washington as U.S. Oil, Gas Deals Take Center Stage 
Venezuela Earthquake Health Risks Rise as Disease Monitoring Intensifies 
Australia Sues Amazon Over Prime Video Ads and Subscription Terms 
Iran Says It Closes Strait of Hormuz After Warning Shot at Vessel 
A federal judge in Chicago has dismissed a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing Illinois and Chicago of obstructing President Donald Trump’s efforts to enforce federal immigration laws. The ruling marks a significant setback for Trump’s campaign to challenge “sanctuary” policies across the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins, appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that Illinois’ TRUST Act and Chicago’s 2012 ordinance—which restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—do not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. Instead, Jenkins cited the Tenth Amendment, which reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states, protecting local autonomy in immigration-related enforcement decisions.
Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, has repeatedly clashed with Democratic-led cities like Chicago over sanctuary policies. Supporters of these laws argue that cooperating with federal immigration enforcement discourages undocumented residents from reporting crimes or cooperating with police, undermining public safety. Critics, including Trump and his allies, claim such policies shield individuals in the country illegally from accountability.
The Justice Department filed the lawsuit in February, alleging the state and city laws conflicted with federal immigration authority. Similar lawsuits are ongoing against New York City and Los Angeles as Trump intensifies his crackdown on local sanctuary policies while campaigning for broader deportations.
The dismissal is a legal victory for Illinois and Chicago, reinforcing their right to limit participation in federal civil immigration enforcement. The ruling could also influence pending cases in other sanctuary jurisdictions. The Justice Department and White House have not yet commented on the decision.
This decision underscores the ongoing legal battles over immigration enforcement powers between federal and local governments amid heightened national debate on immigration policy.
