Anutin’s Bhumjaithai Party Wins Thai Election, Signals Shift Toward Political Stability 
Ghislaine Maxwell to Invoke Fifth Amendment at House Oversight Committee Deposition 
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit 
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy 
Antonio José Seguro Poised for Landslide Win in Portugal Presidential Runoff 
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Trump’s Inflation Claims Clash With Voters’ Cost-of-Living Reality 
Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue 
Nicaragua Ends Visa-Free Entry for Cubans, Disrupting Key Migration Route to the U.S. 
Trump Slams Super Bowl Halftime Show Featuring Bad Bunny 
Trump Administration Appeals Court Order to Release Hudson Tunnel Project Funding 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
China Overturns Death Sentence of Canadian Robert Schellenberg, Signaling Thaw in Canada-China Relations 
Bangladesh Election 2026: A Turning Point After Years of Political Suppression 
Bosnian Serb Presidential Rerun Confirms Victory for Dodik Ally Amid Allegations of Irregularities 
Many have expressed frustration at the DOJ regarding the fact that Trump White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows has not been presented with an indictment over his refusal to cooperate with the Jan. 6 committee. According to Watergate attorney Jill Wine-Banks, two possible federal crimes may be the reason why the DOJ has not indicted the former Trump aide for contempt of Congress.
Speaking on MSNBC, Wine-Banks suggested that the reason why the DOJ is not indicting Meadows for contempt is possibly due to violating two federal crimes. This comes as Los Angeles Times legal analyst Harry Litman said that Meadows appears to be “up to his neck” with the two federal crimes.
“I think some of what we have seen in the last few days may explain why the Department of Justice has not yet indicted Mark Meadows for contempt, and it may be because these documents show him to be an active participant in a coup,” said Wine-Banks.
“And maybe they are looking at him more seriously for a substantive part and for obstructing Congress. I think he could be guilty of both and that it is very important to work between Congress and the prosecutors to make sure of that,” Wine-Banks explained, noting that Congress would not be granting Meadows any immunity if the Justice Department seeks to indict him.
Wine-Banks went on to explain that Congress’s main role is to pass laws to prevent such a coup attempt from happening again, and they can take these measures without Meadows’s testimony if the DOJ plans to indict the former congressman.
The text messages to Meadows related to January 6 were revealed to come from several Republican members of Congress. Following Reps. Chip Roy and Jim Jordan and Senator Mike Lee, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene was also revealed to have texted Meadows.
Days prior to Joe Biden’s inauguration, Greene appeared to send Meadows a message pressing Donald Trump to overturn his 2020 election loss by invoking martial law. Meadows did not seem to respond to Greene’s text message, but the messages to Meadows underline the ideas that were being floated around the former president’s circle after Congress ultimately certified Biden’s election victory.
