Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Kroger Set to Name Former Walmart Executive Greg Foran as Next CEO 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
NEW YORK, Oct. 14, 2016 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the Northern District of California on behalf of investors who purchased Twitter, Inc. (NYSE:TWTR) securities between February 6, 2015 and July 28, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/twitter-inc. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, throughout the Class Period defendants concealed adverse facts they knew or deliberately disregarded, including: (a) that by early 2015, daily active users (“DAUs”) had replaced the timeline views metric as the primary user engagement metric tracked internally by Twitter management; (b) that the trend in user engagement growth was flat or declining; (c) that new product initiatives were not having a meaningful impact on Monthly Active Users (“MAUs”) or user engagement; (d) that Twitter’s stated “acceleration [in MAU growth]” was the result of low-quality MAU growth, and (e) that defendants lacked a basis for their previously issued projections of approximately 20% MAU growth and 550 million MAUs in the immediate term.
If you suffered a loss in Twitter you have until November 15, 2016 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/twitter-inc.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT: Vincent Wong, Esq. 39 East Broadway Suite 304 New York, NY 10002 Tel. 212.425.1140 Fax. 866.699.3880 E-Mail: [email protected]
