Menu

Search

  |   Politics

Menu

  |   Politics

Search

Trump Administration Proposes New Rule to Limit Joint Employer Liability

Trump Administration Proposes New Rule to Limit Joint Employer Liability. Source: US Department of Labor, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The Trump administration has introduced a proposed rule that could significantly reshape how companies are held accountable for labor violations involving contractors and franchise workers. Announced by the U.S. Department of Labor, the rule aims to narrow the definition of “joint employer” under federal wage laws, including those governing minimum wage and overtime pay.

Under the proposal, a company would only be considered a joint employer if it exercises direct and substantial control over key aspects of employment, such as hiring, supervision, pay, and maintaining employee records. This approach mirrors a similar rule implemented during Trump’s first term, which was later rescinded under former President Joe Biden.

Acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling emphasized that the proposed regulation is designed to simplify compliance for businesses. He stated that establishing a clear and consistent standard would encourage companies to invest in partnerships, while also helping workers better understand their rights. The Department of Labor believes the change could streamline enforcement efforts and improve the efficiency of workplace investigations.

The rule, which will be officially published soon, will undergo a 60-day public comment period before any final decision is made. If adopted, it could take effect later this year and influence both government enforcement actions and private lawsuits, although courts would not be required to follow it.

The issue of joint employment has been a long-standing and highly debated topic in U.S. labor law. Recently, the National Labor Relations Board also rolled back a Biden-era rule, reinstating a Trump-era standard that similarly limits joint employer liability.

However, worker advocacy groups have raised concerns. Organizations like the Economic Policy Institute argue that narrowing the definition could make it harder to address wage theft and protect workers, potentially costing employees billions in lost wages.

  • Market Data
Close

Welcome to EconoTimes

Sign up for daily updates for the most important
stories unfolding in the global economy.