Trump Says “Very Good Talks” Underway on Russia-Ukraine War as Peace Efforts Continue 
Bangladesh Election 2026: A Turning Point After Years of Political Suppression 
Trump Signs Executive Order Threatening 25% Tariffs on Countries Trading With Iran 
China Warns US Arms Sales to Taiwan Could Disrupt Trump’s Planned Visit 
Jack Lang Resigns as Head of Arab World Institute Amid Epstein Controversy 
Japan Election 2026: Sanae Takaichi Poised for Landslide Win Despite Record Snowfall 
New York Legalizes Medical Aid in Dying for Terminally Ill Patients 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Anutin’s Bhumjaithai Party Wins Thai Election, Signals Shift Toward Political Stability 
India–U.S. Interim Trade Pact Cuts Auto Tariffs but Leaves Tesla Out 
Netanyahu to Meet Trump in Washington as Iran Nuclear Talks Intensify 
Trump Allows Commercial Fishing in Protected New England Waters 
Antonio José Seguro Poised for Landslide Win in Portugal Presidential Runoff 
Ghislaine Maxwell to Invoke Fifth Amendment at House Oversight Committee Deposition 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Bosnian Serb Presidential Rerun Confirms Victory for Dodik Ally Amid Allegations of Irregularities 
US Pushes Ukraine-Russia Peace Talks Before Summer Amid Escalating Attacks 
A high court in the United Kingdom ruled against the British government’s scheme regarding the resettlement of EU citizens. The court ruled that the plan was unlawful and breached the withdrawal agreement when the UK left the European Union.
Judge Peter Lane of London’s High Court ruled on Wednesday in favor of the Independent Monitoring Authority that oversees citizens’ rights in a lawsuit the group filed against the British government. The IMA argued that the UK is breaching its withdrawal agreement with the EU when it left the bloc by requiring EU citizens to reapply for the right to reside and work in the UK.
Lane said that the British government’s interpretation of the withdrawal agreement was “wrong in law” and that the scheme to require EU citizens to reapply was unlawful. Lane granted the Home Office permission to file an appeal.
Lawyers for the IMA argued during the hearing last month that the scheme unlawfully requires EU citizens to reapply after being allowed to stay in the UK or lose their rights of residence. EU citizens and their family members who have yet to establish a right of permanent residence in the UK before the end of 2020 can be granted a limited leave to enter and remain in the country for five years. This is also known as the “pre-settled status.”
However, attorney Robert Palmer, who is representing the IMA, argued that this part of the resettlement scheme for EU citizens was “straightforwardly incompatible with the withdrawal agreement.”
Home Office minister Simon Murray said the ministry will appeal Lane’s decision.
On Monday, two High Court judges ruled in favor of the British government, saying that the plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda was lawful. However, the judges also questioned whether the government considered the individual circumstances of those who are entering the UK with such claims.
A court hearing in the case is set for January, and appeals are likely going to be made.
The ruling follows the lawsuits filed by several asylum seekers, aid groups, and a union of border officials to block the Conservative government from enforcing a deportation agreement with Rwanda that would send refugees that arrive in the UK by boat to the East African nation.
