Austal Shares Surge 16% as Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for U.S. Shipbuilding Business 
Sony, TSMC Eye $6.3 Billion Japan Chip Venture for Next-Gen Image Sensors 
Hims & Hers Shares Fall as GLP-1 Costs Widen Q2 Loss 
Daimler Truck Q2 Profit Falls 18%, 2026 Outlook Raised 
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026 
Goldman Sachs Sees US Stock Buybacks Outpacing Equity Issuance as AI Funding Rises 
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Falls as Abel Boosts Stock Buybacks 
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants 
Apple Tests China’s CXMT Memory Chips for iPhones and MacBooks Amid AI Supply Crunch 
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Jump as U.S. Overhaul Lifts FY2026 Outlook 
Deutsche Bank Upgrades Persimmon to Buy After Strong First-Half Results 
Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported 
Sanrio Shares Plunge as Q1 Profit Miss Overshadows Strong Sales 
Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for Austal US Business 
Mercedes-Benz Stock Offers Deep-Value Potential as Citi Sees Recovery Catalysts 
OpenAI Executive Brad Lightcap to Leave for New AI Venture 
Amazon Inc. claimed its win in a fight against the European Commission that accused it of benefiting from illegal tax breaks. The top court in Europe sided with the American e-commerce giant by dismissing the appeal of the EU and effectively upholding the previous ruling that favored the company.
In declaring its decision, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) explained that the EU's executive unit had not established that a tax agreement between Amazon and Luxembourg was a state aid that was not compatible with the internal market, as per CNBC.
Blow to EU’s Margrethe Vestager
The Court of Justice's latest resolution in Amazon's $270 million or €250 tax bill is said to be a binding ruling. It was handed down on Thursday, Dec. 14, and officially discarded the European Commission's appeal.
In any case, business observers opined that the outcome is another burning defeat for Margrethe Vestager, the EU Competition's commissioner who led the campaign against special tax treatment being granted to major firms by member states. She has been involved in this effort for years and slapped Apple Inc. with a record €13 billion penalty, a case still awaiting a final decision at the top court.
Reactions to ECJ's Ruling
Reuters reported that the EU top court's decision is final. This means Amazon no longer has to shell out $273 million to pay taxes to Luxembourg. The spokesperson of the company issued a statement shortly after its court win.
"We welcome the Court's ruling, which confirms that Amazon followed all applicable laws and received no special treatment," he said. "We look forward to continuing to focus on delivering for our customers across Europe."
On the other hand, some individuals are against the case's outcome. An Oxfam EU tax expert, Chiara Putaturo, slammed the decision by saying, "Amazon got an early Christmas present this year, as the company dodged its decade-old tax bill to Luxembourg and can continue to do so."
She added, "This is why the EU must come forward with real tax reforms. It can start by not looking the other way when it comes to tax havens within its borders allowing companies to sidestep their tax bills through empty offices."
Photo by: Yender Gonzalez/Unsplash
