Amazon Inc. claimed its win in a fight against the European Commission that accused it of benefiting from illegal tax breaks. The top court in Europe sided with the American e-commerce giant by dismissing the appeal of the EU and effectively upholding the previous ruling that favored the company.
In declaring its decision, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) explained that the EU's executive unit had not established that a tax agreement between Amazon and Luxembourg was a state aid that was not compatible with the internal market, as per CNBC.
Blow to EU’s Margrethe Vestager
The Court of Justice's latest resolution in Amazon's $270 million or €250 tax bill is said to be a binding ruling. It was handed down on Thursday, Dec. 14, and officially discarded the European Commission's appeal.
In any case, business observers opined that the outcome is another burning defeat for Margrethe Vestager, the EU Competition's commissioner who led the campaign against special tax treatment being granted to major firms by member states. She has been involved in this effort for years and slapped Apple Inc. with a record €13 billion penalty, a case still awaiting a final decision at the top court.
Reactions to ECJ's Ruling
Reuters reported that the EU top court's decision is final. This means Amazon no longer has to shell out $273 million to pay taxes to Luxembourg. The spokesperson of the company issued a statement shortly after its court win.
"We welcome the Court's ruling, which confirms that Amazon followed all applicable laws and received no special treatment," he said. "We look forward to continuing to focus on delivering for our customers across Europe."
On the other hand, some individuals are against the case's outcome. An Oxfam EU tax expert, Chiara Putaturo, slammed the decision by saying, "Amazon got an early Christmas present this year, as the company dodged its decade-old tax bill to Luxembourg and can continue to do so."
She added, "This is why the EU must come forward with real tax reforms. It can start by not looking the other way when it comes to tax havens within its borders allowing companies to sidestep their tax bills through empty offices."
Photo by: Yender Gonzalez/Unsplash


FedEx Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling
FCC Approves Charter Communications’ $34.5 Billion Acquisition of Cox Communications
Greg Abel’s First Berkshire Hathaway Shareholder Letter Signals Continuity, Caution, and Capital Discipline
Meta Signs Multi-Billion Dollar AI Chip Deal With Google to Power Next-Gen AI Models
Nintendo Share Sale: MUFG and Bank of Kyoto to Sell Stakes in Strategic Unwinding
Hyundai Motor Group to Invest $6.26 Billion in AI Data Center, Robotics and Renewable Energy Projects in South Korea
Trump Media Weighs Truth Social Spin-Off Amid $6B Fusion Energy Pivot
OpenAI Pentagon AI Contract Adds Safeguards Amid Anthropic Dispute
Amazon’s $50B OpenAI Investment Tied to AGI Milestone and IPO Plans
Samsung Electronics Stock Poised for $1 Trillion Valuation Amid AI and Memory Boom
Trump Orders Federal Agencies to Halt Use of Anthropic AI Technology
Snowflake Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Revenue Growth as Enterprise AI Demand Surges
OpenAI Hires Former Meta and Apple AI Leader Ruomin Pang Amid Intensifying AI Talent War
Netflix Declines to Raise Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery Amid Competing Paramount Skydance Offer
Panama Investigates CK Hutchison’s Port Unit After Court Voids Canal Contracts
Pentagon Weighs Supply Chain Risk Designation for Anthropic Over Claude AI Use
Coupang Reports Q4 Loss After Data Breach, Revenue Misses Estimates 



