Apple has opposed the UK’s proposed new surveillance law saying that the measures risk sensitive information of the law-abiding citizens, Financial Times reported.
“The creation of back doors and intercept capabilities would weaken the protections built into Apple products and endanger all our customers,” Bloomberg quoted Apple’s submission to the U.K. parliamentary committee considering the bill. “A key left under the doormat would not just be there for the good guys. The bad guys would find it too.”
UK home secretary Theresa May proposed the measures in the draft investigatory powers bill last month, saying they were crucial to the fight against terrorism. According to Business Day Live, the bill seeks to considerably expand government’s powers and change surveillance laws to require companies such as Apple to retain "permanent interception capabilities" for communications, including "the ability to remove any encryption".
“There are hundreds of products that use encryption to protect user data, many of them open-source and beyond the regulation of any one government,” Apple said. “By mandating weakened encryption in Apple products, this bill will put law-abiding citizens at risk, not the criminals, hackers and terrorists who will continue having access to encryption.”
The Cupertino company pointed out that the country’s demand for the ability to access to data held in other countries would “immobilise substantial portions of the tech sector and spark serious international conflicts”.
“It would also likely be the catalyst for other countries to enact similar laws, paralysing multinational corporations under the weight of what could be dozens or hundreds of contradictory country-specific laws”, Apple said.
Social-networking and tech giants including Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo and Microsoft also will be submitting similar evidence to the parliamentary committee, sources told FT.
“We are clear about the need for legislation that will provide law enforcement and the security and intelligence agencies with the powers they need in the digital age, subject to strict safeguards and world-leading oversight arrangements,” U.K. Security Minister John Hayes said in an e-mailed statement Tuesday, Bloomberg reported.


Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political
Bolsonaro Discharged After Shoulder Surgery Amid Ongoing Legal Troubles
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone
Trump and IRS in Settlement Talks Over $10 Billion Tax Return Leak Lawsuit
Trump DOJ Challenges Colorado’s Large-Capacity Magazine Ban in Second Amendment Lawsuit
US Trade Court Blocks Trump’s 10% Global Tariffs
Coles “Down Down” Ruling Sparks Fresh Scrutiny of Australian Supermarket Pricing
Florida Investigates OpenAI and ChatGPT Over Alleged Role in FSU Shooting
Arcadia Mayor Eileen Wang Pleads Guilty in China Foreign Agent Case
DOJ May Drop Gautam Adani Fraud Charges Amid $10 Billion U.S. Investment Plan
Aung San Suu Kyi Moved to House Arrest Amid Myanmar Political Crisis
Argentina Court Upholds Cristina Kirchner Asset Seizure in Corruption Case
Trump-Xi Summit Sparks Renewed Hope for Americans Detained in China
Judge Dismisses Elon Musk’s Fraud Claims Against OpenAI, Trial to Proceed on Remaining Allegations
DOJ Ends Probe Into Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Boosting Kevin Warsh Confirmation Prospects 



