Apple has opposed the UK’s proposed new surveillance law saying that the measures risk sensitive information of the law-abiding citizens, Financial Times reported.
“The creation of back doors and intercept capabilities would weaken the protections built into Apple products and endanger all our customers,” Bloomberg quoted Apple’s submission to the U.K. parliamentary committee considering the bill. “A key left under the doormat would not just be there for the good guys. The bad guys would find it too.”
UK home secretary Theresa May proposed the measures in the draft investigatory powers bill last month, saying they were crucial to the fight against terrorism. According to Business Day Live, the bill seeks to considerably expand government’s powers and change surveillance laws to require companies such as Apple to retain "permanent interception capabilities" for communications, including "the ability to remove any encryption".
“There are hundreds of products that use encryption to protect user data, many of them open-source and beyond the regulation of any one government,” Apple said. “By mandating weakened encryption in Apple products, this bill will put law-abiding citizens at risk, not the criminals, hackers and terrorists who will continue having access to encryption.”
The Cupertino company pointed out that the country’s demand for the ability to access to data held in other countries would “immobilise substantial portions of the tech sector and spark serious international conflicts”.
“It would also likely be the catalyst for other countries to enact similar laws, paralysing multinational corporations under the weight of what could be dozens or hundreds of contradictory country-specific laws”, Apple said.
Social-networking and tech giants including Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo and Microsoft also will be submitting similar evidence to the parliamentary committee, sources told FT.
“We are clear about the need for legislation that will provide law enforcement and the security and intelligence agencies with the powers they need in the digital age, subject to strict safeguards and world-leading oversight arrangements,” U.K. Security Minister John Hayes said in an e-mailed statement Tuesday, Bloomberg reported.


Kennedy Center Ordered to Remove Trump Name Following Federal Court Ruling
U.S. Supreme Court Allows Alabama’s Republican-Backed Congressional Map for 2026 Elections
Australia Sues 3M for Over A$2 Billion Over PFAS Firefighting Foam Contamination
Sable Offshore Wins Key Court Battle Over California Oil Pipeline
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members
U.S. Reinstates Sanctions on U.N. Expert Francesca Albanese Amid Legal Battle
Trump Administration Urges Judge to Allow UFC Event on White House Lawn
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury
US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit
South Korea Ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol Sentenced to 30 Years Over Martial Law Plot
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court
Italy’s ITA Airways Weighs Legal Action Against Pratt & Whitney Over Grounded Airbus Fleet
Brazil Supreme Court Convicts Eduardo Bolsonaro Over U.S. Lobbying Efforts 



