Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a wide range of high-stakes cases challenging his administration’s policies. The rulings and pending decisions touch on tariffs, immigration enforcement, federal agency independence, transgender rights, foreign aid, and the scope of presidential authority, shaping the legal landscape of Trump’s second term.
In a landmark 6-3 decision on February 20, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The justices ruled that the 1977 law did not authorize the president to unilaterally impose broad tariffs, reaffirming that the Constitution grants Congress — not the executive branch — the power to levy taxes and regulate trade. The decision carries major implications for global markets and U.S. trade policy.
Immigration policy has also dominated the court’s docket. The justices allowed immigration raids in California to proceed, cleared the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, and permitted the rollback of immigration “parole” protections for migrants from several countries. At the same time, the court blocked certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, citing due process concerns, and ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a wrongly deported Salvadoran man. The justices will soon hear arguments over Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
The court has signaled support for expanding presidential control over federal agencies. It allowed Trump to remove officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and federal labor boards, and appeared receptive to arguments supporting his firing of a Federal Trade Commission member. However, it showed skepticism toward his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Additional rulings have permitted a transgender military ban, upheld passport restrictions tied to sex at birth, allowed mass federal layoffs, approved cuts to medical research and teacher training grants, cleared the dismantling of the Education Department, and enabled temporary withholding of foreign aid.
Collectively, these Supreme Court decisions underscore an ongoing legal battle over executive power, constitutional limits, and the future direction of U.S. domestic and foreign policy.


Cuba Weighs $100M U.S. Aid Offer Amid Fuel Crisis
Trump-Xi Summit Sparks Renewed Hope for Americans Detained in China
US Hosts Israel-Lebanon Talks as Ceasefire Deadline Nears
US Expects China to Boost Purchases of American Farm Products After Trump-Xi Summit
U.S. Urges China to Help Curb Iran’s Actions in Gulf, Rubio Says
Trump Says China to Boost U.S. Oil Imports After Xi Talks
Nvidia’s China AI Chip Sales Remain Frozen Despite U.S. Approval
Trump Pushes China Market Access During High-Stakes Xi Summit
Sinaloa Governor Ruben Rocha Denies U.S. Cartel Allegations, Calls Charges Political
Supreme Court Asked to Reinstate Mail-Order Access to Abortion Pill Mifepristone
U.S. Army Soldier Charged in $400K Insider Betting Scheme on Maduro Capture
US Trade Court Blocks Trump’s 10% Global Tariffs
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case
Federal Appeals Court Allows Texas SB4 Immigration Law Enforcement to Proceed
Matthew Wale Elected Solomon Islands Prime Minister After No-Confidence Vote
Macron Faces Political Test Over Bank of France Nomination Ahead of 2027 Election
ICC Pressure Mounts as Families of Duterte Drug War Victims Demand Justice 



