DEA Reopens Santo Domingo Office After Corruption Scandal 
Peter Mandelson Arrested in London Amid Jeffrey Epstein Ties Investigation 
Mexico's Electoral Reform Bill Fails in Congress as Coalition Fractures 
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, Deepening Global Trade Uncertainty 
USTR Launches New Section 301 Trade Investigations After Supreme Court Tariff Ruling 
UBS Seeks Legal Protection Over Credit Suisse's Nazi-Era Banking Activities 
Does international law still matter? The strike on the girls’ school in Iran shows why we need it 
US Prepares Record $14 Billion Taiwan Arms Deal Pending Trump's China Visit 
Khamenei Vows to Keep Hormuz Shut as Netanyahu Issues Veiled Death Threat 
After the Iran war, Persian Gulf nations face tough decisions on the US – a former diplomat explains 
Maduro Seeks Dismissal of U.S. Drug Trafficking Case, Citing Sanctions Interference 
Iran's Government Remains Stable Despite U.S. and Israeli Strikes, Intelligence Shows 
Canada's $35 Billion Arctic Defense Plan: Reducing Reliance on the U.S. 
Democratic Attorneys General Sue Trump Administration Over CDC Childhood Vaccine Schedule Changes 
Bipartisan Housing Bill Advances in Senate, Aims to Tackle U.S. Affordability Crisis 
U.S. and Allies Clash with Russia and China at UN Over Iran Nuclear War Justification 
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law 
Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a wide range of high-stakes cases challenging his administration’s policies. The rulings and pending decisions touch on tariffs, immigration enforcement, federal agency independence, transgender rights, foreign aid, and the scope of presidential authority, shaping the legal landscape of Trump’s second term.
In a landmark 6-3 decision on February 20, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The justices ruled that the 1977 law did not authorize the president to unilaterally impose broad tariffs, reaffirming that the Constitution grants Congress — not the executive branch — the power to levy taxes and regulate trade. The decision carries major implications for global markets and U.S. trade policy.
Immigration policy has also dominated the court’s docket. The justices allowed immigration raids in California to proceed, cleared the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, and permitted the rollback of immigration “parole” protections for migrants from several countries. At the same time, the court blocked certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, citing due process concerns, and ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a wrongly deported Salvadoran man. The justices will soon hear arguments over Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
The court has signaled support for expanding presidential control over federal agencies. It allowed Trump to remove officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and federal labor boards, and appeared receptive to arguments supporting his firing of a Federal Trade Commission member. However, it showed skepticism toward his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Additional rulings have permitted a transgender military ban, upheld passport restrictions tied to sex at birth, allowed mass federal layoffs, approved cuts to medical research and teacher training grants, cleared the dismantling of the Education Department, and enabled temporary withholding of foreign aid.
Collectively, these Supreme Court decisions underscore an ongoing legal battle over executive power, constitutional limits, and the future direction of U.S. domestic and foreign policy.
