Since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a wide range of high-stakes cases challenging his administration’s policies. The rulings and pending decisions touch on tariffs, immigration enforcement, federal agency independence, transgender rights, foreign aid, and the scope of presidential authority, shaping the legal landscape of Trump’s second term.
In a landmark 6-3 decision on February 20, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The justices ruled that the 1977 law did not authorize the president to unilaterally impose broad tariffs, reaffirming that the Constitution grants Congress — not the executive branch — the power to levy taxes and regulate trade. The decision carries major implications for global markets and U.S. trade policy.
Immigration policy has also dominated the court’s docket. The justices allowed immigration raids in California to proceed, cleared the revocation of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, and permitted the rollback of immigration “parole” protections for migrants from several countries. At the same time, the court blocked certain deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, citing due process concerns, and ordered the administration to facilitate the return of a wrongly deported Salvadoran man. The justices will soon hear arguments over Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment.
The court has signaled support for expanding presidential control over federal agencies. It allowed Trump to remove officials from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and federal labor boards, and appeared receptive to arguments supporting his firing of a Federal Trade Commission member. However, it showed skepticism toward his attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
Additional rulings have permitted a transgender military ban, upheld passport restrictions tied to sex at birth, allowed mass federal layoffs, approved cuts to medical research and teacher training grants, cleared the dismantling of the Education Department, and enabled temporary withholding of foreign aid.
Collectively, these Supreme Court decisions underscore an ongoing legal battle over executive power, constitutional limits, and the future direction of U.S. domestic and foreign policy.


Ukraine Tests New Anti-Drone Weapon After Successful Shahed Intercept
Ukraine Races to Counter Russia’s Faster Jet-Powered Drones
Sweden Election: Centre-Left Holds Narrow Lead
Australia’s Corporate Leaders Face Parliament Over KPMG Client Data Scandal
Judge Rejects Minnesota Bid to Force ICE Agent Extradition
US Court Approves airBaltic Chapter 11 Restructuring
Sara Duterte Posts Bail Over Grave Threats Case
Kim Jong Un Pledges Deeper Russia Cooperation
Judge Blocks Trump Rule Limiting Foreign Student Visas
Honduras Court Drops Charges Against Ex-President Juan Orlando Hernandez
Trump Open to Chinese Automakers Building Cars in US
SEC Seeks ISS Client Voting Records in Proxy Adviser Probe
What is Zionism? The different meanings of a contested term
Sun Pharma Wins U.S. Appeal in Pfizer Lipitor Antitrust Case
Banking scandal rocks Brazil’s politics and the country’s presidential election in October
US Weighs New Sanctions Against Brazil Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes
Mahmoud Khalil Sues Columbia Over Alleged Pro-Palestinian Harassment 



