UK Wage Growth Slows as BoE Rate Decision Looms 
US Judge Dismisses Imran Ahmed Deportation Lawsuit 
Hormuz Vessel Traffic Drops to Single Digits 
Saudi Oil Exports Face 4% Global Supply Threat as Pipeline Remains Shut 
Sara Duterte Posts Bail Over Grave Threats Case 
Global Central Banks Brace for More Rate Hikes as Inflation Risks Rise 
Judge Blocks Trump Mail Voting Order Ahead of 2026 Midterms 
TikTok, DOJ Reach $400 Million Children’s Privacy Settlement 
EUR/USD Eyes 1.17 as Fed Decision Could Weigh on Dollar 
Maduro Seeks Dismissal of US Drug Trafficking Charges 
Finland Raises 2026 Growth Forecast as Exports and Investment Surge 
Trump’s Arlington Arch Project Faces New Court Restrictions 
Meta Agrees to $18 Billion Settlement, Tightens Teen Social Media Rules 
Asian Bank Stocks Slide as BofA Warning and Rising Yields Hit Sentiment 
Honduras Court Drops Charges Against Ex-President Juan Orlando Hernandez 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that six Chinese banks weren't liable for $150 million in sanctions due to the failure of Next Investments LLC to freeze the assets of hundreds of Nike counterfeiters.
Next, which acquired the $1.8 billion default award from Nike Inc, had failed to enforce the freeze against the banks for nearly six years before asking the court to hold them in contempt, said US Circuit Judge Michael Park for a unanimous three-judge panel.
In 2015, Nike and its Converse Inc unit won the default judgment against over 600 Chinese entities and individuals in the Manhattan federal court.
US District Judge Shira Scheindlin also restrained the defendants and everyone acting in concert or in participation with them from transferring their assets.
Nike sold its interest in the judgment to Houston-based Next Investments LLC in 2017.
Next subpoenaed six Chinese banks with New York branches where the counterfeiters allegedly had accounts and filed contempt charges against them in 2019 for failing to comply with the asset restraining orders, asking $150 million in compensatory damages.
Senior US District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Next's motion in 2020 as US branches of foreign banks are separate legal entities.
The separate entity rule also kept the court from enforcing the freeze as to assets in China.
On appeal, Next insisted that the separate entity rule shouldn't enable counterfeiting, among other things.
Park, Senior Circuit Judge Jon Newman, and Circuit Judge Steven Menashi declined to hold the banks in contempt or enforce the order.
On top of its failure to enforce the orders against the banks for nearly six years, Nike and Next "explicitly disclaimed" that they would invoke the ruling against four of the banks.
The court also said that there was a "fair ground of doubt" about the orders' applicability to the banks due to the separate entity rule.
Adam Hoffinger, who represented the Agricultural Bank of China, said the decision reaffirmed that his client had done nothing wrong.
