How is Antarctica melting, exactly? Crucial details are beginning to come into focus 
We combed through old botanical surveys to track how plants on Australia’s islands are changing 
GesiaPlatform Launches Carbon-Neutral Lifestyle App ‘Net Zero Heroes’ 
NASA Cuts Boeing Starliner Missions as SpaceX Pulls Ahead 
FDA Adds Fatal Risk Warning to J&J and Legend Biotech’s Carvykti Cancer Therapy 
LA fires: Long-term exposure to wildfire smoke is poorly understood − and a growing risk 
Blue Origin New Glenn Explosion Could Delay Launch Operations Until 2028 
As the Black Summer megafires neared, people rallied to save wildlife and domestic animals. But it came at a real cost 
What’s so special about Ukraine’s minerals? A geologist explains 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Trump Administration to Launch Autism Initiatives Targeting Acetaminophen Use and New Treatment Options 
Neuralink Plans High-Volume Brain Implant Production and Fully Automated Surgery by 2026 
Climate change is one of the biggest problems the world faces today, even in the midst of a pandemic. With scientists looking into possible solutions to end the crisis, new research has suggested that not every solution could be applied to the entire world.
One of the proposed solutions to reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere was through cutting out meat from our diets. This is because meat production farms have been found as a major source of greenhouse emissions through the use of land, feed production, and transportation. The same applies to dairy products. The Committee on Climate Change proposed that reducing one-fifth of meat and dairy consumption could be able to save seven million tons of carbon dioxide emissions from meat production farms.
However, according to new research by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture, cutting out meat and dairy products cannot be a blanket solution in battling the climate crisis. The study noted that previous findings or criticisms towards the meat production industry are focused on western industries and thus cannot be applied to other countries that may have low-income or already practice more sustainable ways of livestock rearing.
“Conclusions drawn in widely publicized reports argue that a main solution to the climate and human health crisis globally is to eat little or no meat but they are biased towards industrialized, Western systems,” said the study’s lead author Birthe Paul.
The study’s authors also note that by focusing on the negative effects of meat production, the positive effects of sustainable meat production in the ecosystem are ignored. “Mixed systems in low and middle-income countries, where animal production is fully linked with crop production, can actually be more environmentally sustainable,” said An Notenbaert of the Alliance of Bioversity International.
The effects of climate change are becoming more and more present in the colder regions of the world, Antarctica most of all. Scientists have now detected cracks in the Brunt Ice Shelf of the frozen continent and warned that should the cracks continue, the ice shelf may release a massive iceberg into the ocean. What would happen after the break remains to be seen, but it has prompted concerns for the scientists that work on the ice shelf.
