A major development has emerged in the long-running Johnson & Johnson talc litigation, marking a significant moment for tens of thousands of women who allege the company’s baby powder and other talc-based products caused their ovarian cancer. On Tuesday, a court-appointed special master recommended that plaintiffs be allowed to present expert testimony supporting a causal link between genital talc use and ovarian cancer, a decision that moves the federal cases closer to their first trial.
The recommendation was issued by retired U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson, who evaluated whether expert testimony met federal scientific standards. The litigation, centralized in New Jersey federal court, includes more than 67,500 product liability lawsuits. These cases hinge heavily on expert evidence to establish whether Johnson & Johnson’s talc products are capable of causing cancer.
In a 658-page report, Wolfson concluded that the plaintiffs’ experts used reliable scientific methodologies and that epidemiological studies, both before and after 2020, collectively show a statistically significant association between genital talc powder use and ovarian cancer. She emphasized that the experts’ conclusions met the legal threshold required for testimony at trial, despite Johnson & Johnson’s ongoing dispute of the alleged link.
However, Wolfson sided with the company on other points, recommending the exclusion of expert testimony that attempted to link heavy metals or fragrance chemicals in the products to cancer. She also deferred rulings on several additional evidentiary issues, scheduling further hearings later this month and in early February.
The case is being overseen by U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp, who requested a reevaluation of the scientific evidence in light of updated federal rules governing expert testimony and the emergence of new research. Wolfson previously reviewed the evidence in 2020 and had then allowed expert testimony related to possible asbestos contamination, a claim Johnson & Johnson denies.
Johnson & Johnson has fought talc lawsuits for years, including multiple unsuccessful attempts to resolve the claims through bankruptcy, most recently rejected in April 2025. The company stopped selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. in 2020, switching to cornstarch, while maintaining that its products are safe and do not cause cancer.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys hailed the recommendation as a crucial step toward accountability, while investors reacted cautiously, with Johnson & Johnson shares dipping slightly in after-hours trading. As the litigation advances, the ruling could prove pivotal in shaping the future of one of the largest mass tort cases in U.S. history.


FedEx Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds After Supreme Court Ruling
Domino's Pizza UK Reports 15% Drop in Annual Profit Amid Weak Sales and Rising Costs
Federal Judge Orders Refund of Trump’s Emergency Tariffs, Potentially Returning Up to $182 Billion
U.S. Blocks Venezuela From Funding Nicolas Maduro’s Legal Defense in New York Drug Trafficking Case
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Sues Sanofi Over Alleged Healthcare Bribery Scheme
Morgan Stanley Limits Withdrawals at Private Credit Fund Amid Market Turmoil
Moderna to Pay Up to $2.25B to Settle LNP Patent Dispute Over COVID-19 Vaccine Technology
Nintendo Stock Surges 10% as Pokémon Pokopia Breaks Sales Records
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law
Heinz Wattie's to Close Three New Zealand Plants, Cutting 350 Jobs
UK Regulators Demand Social Media Platforms Strengthen Children's Age Verification
Robinhood Banking Surpasses $1 Billion in Deposits Following Successful Relaunch
Alphabet's GFiber Merges with Astound Broadband to Build Major U.S. Internet Provider
U.S. Senate Greenlights AI Chatbots for Official Staff Use
Maduro Seeks Dismissal of U.S. Drug Trafficking Case, Citing Sanctions Interference 



