Sanofi Gains China Approval for Myqorzo and Redemplo, Strengthening Rare Disease Portfolio 
Microsoft Strikes Landmark Soil Carbon Credit Deal With Indigo Carbon to Boost Carbon-Negative Goal 
U.S. Moves to Expand Chevron License and Control Venezuelan Oil Sales 
Boeing Reaches Tentative Labor Deal With SPEEA Workers After Spirit AeroSystems Acquisition 
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production 
U.S. Transportation Board Sends Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger Back for Revision 
Toyota Industries Buyout Faces Resistance as Elliott Rejects Higher Offer 
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling 
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement 
China Considers New Rules to Limit Purchases of Foreign AI Chips Amid Growing Demand 
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft 
Anthropic Appoints Former Microsoft Executive Irina Ghose to Lead India Expansion 
Proposed Rio Tinto–Glencore Merger Faces China Regulatory Hurdles and Asset Sale Pressure 
xAI Restricts Grok Image Editing After Sexualized AI Images Trigger Global Scrutiny 
Elon Musk Seeks $134 Billion in Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Alleged Wrongful Gains 
Trump Criticizes NYSE Texas Expansion, Calls Dallas Exchange a Blow to New York 
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan overturned a $21 million judgment in favor of Tiffany & Co's against Costco Wholesale Corp over the latter's sale of diamond engagement rings bearing the "Tiffany" name.
In a 3-0 decision, the court agreed with Costco's argument that its use of the name "Tiffany" was unlikely to confuse customers. It also ruled that Costco may describe the style of its engagement rings even if confusion were likely.
Tiffany had sued Costco for trademark infringement in 2013 after an estimated 3,349 customers bought Tiffany-set rings at Costco during Valentine's Day season that year.
Costco countered that "Tiffany" had become a generic term, and claimed it had removed the "Tiffany" signage within a week after being contacted by that company.
The $21 million awarded to Tiffany, one of the world's most famous luxury retailers, included $11.1 million for lost profit due to the alleged infringement, $8.25 million in punitive damages, and interest.
