X Challenges Australia’s Expanded Social Media Ban Enforcement Powers 
SK Hynix Q2 Profit Hits Record as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Growth 
CATL Shares Jump as $5.6 Billion Buyback Signals Confidence in Long-Term Growth 
Rio Tinto Stock Jumps as Strong Earnings, Higher Dividend and AI Metal Demand Boost Outlook 
Meta CEO Zuckerberg Opposes U.S. Ban on Chinese AI Models, Warns Against Overregulation 
TSMC Gradually Restarts Japan Chip Plant After Kumamoto Earthquake 
Nvidia Eyes $250B Guarantee for OpenAI’s Massive Ohio AI Data Center Project 
BHP, Port Hedland Unions Fail to Reach Wage Deal as Negotiations Continue 
TeamViewer Shares Fall Despite Profit Growth as ARR and Customer Base Decline 
Air Liquide Q2 Sales Growth Tops Forecast as Electronics Business Drives Strong Performance 
AstraZeneca Q2 Earnings Beat Forecasts as Oncology Growth Supports 2026 Outlook 
Standard Chartered Beats Profit Forecasts as First-Half Earnings Rise 9% 
Nvidia Invests $1 Billion in Naver as South Korea AI Data Center Expansion Gains Momentum 
Sika Raises 2026 Sales Outlook After Strong First-Half Results Beat Expectations 
CXMT IPO Debut in Shanghai Puts $85.5 Billion Chipmaker in Spotlight 
Brown-Forman Rejects Sazerac’s $15 Billion Takeover Bid as Family Backs Independence 
Zabka Shares Drop 10% as Seven & i Abandons Investment Plans 
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan overturned a $21 million judgment in favor of Tiffany & Co's against Costco Wholesale Corp over the latter's sale of diamond engagement rings bearing the "Tiffany" name.
In a 3-0 decision, the court agreed with Costco's argument that its use of the name "Tiffany" was unlikely to confuse customers. It also ruled that Costco may describe the style of its engagement rings even if confusion were likely.
Tiffany had sued Costco for trademark infringement in 2013 after an estimated 3,349 customers bought Tiffany-set rings at Costco during Valentine's Day season that year.
Costco countered that "Tiffany" had become a generic term, and claimed it had removed the "Tiffany" signage within a week after being contacted by that company.
The $21 million awarded to Tiffany, one of the world's most famous luxury retailers, included $11.1 million for lost profit due to the alleged infringement, $8.25 million in punitive damages, and interest.
