TetherMax Rebranding Highlights Official Exchange Partnerships as Foundation of Trust 
Northern Star Appoints New CEO as Activist Elliott Pushes for Leadership Overhaul 
AI Memory Chip Shortage Likely to Persist Despite Korea Investment Boom, Nomura Says 
EU Chip Industry Faces Growing Risks From China Export Controls and U.S. Technology Dependence: Report 
Foxconn Q2 Revenue Surges Nearly 40% on Strong AI Server Demand 
Anthropic Tightens AI Access Controls After Reports of China-Based Workarounds 
Chinese Copper Foil Maker Londian Files U.S. IPO as EV Battery Demand Grows 
easyJet Agrees in Principle to £5.23 Billion Castlelake Takeover Offer 
Meta Cloud Ambitions Could Challenge AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, Says Morgan Stanley 
Kioxia Bets on AI Memory Boom With Next-Gen NAND Production in Japan 
Norway Offshore Oil Workers Reach Wage Deal, Averting Strike 
Lockheed Martin Emerges as Frontrunner to Acquire Ultra Maritime in $3.5 Billion Defense Deal 
Meta CEO Zuckerberg Says AI Agent Development Has Slowed Despite Massive AI Investment 
Switch Seeks $2 Billion Funding at Nearly $50 Billion Valuation Ahead of Potential IPO 
Kuaishou Stock Jumps as Kling AI Secures $2 Billion Funding Round 
BHP Workers Approve New Labour Agreement at WA Iron Ore Operations 
Super Micro Employees Detained in Taiwan AI Server Export Investigation 
The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan overturned a $21 million judgment in favor of Tiffany & Co's against Costco Wholesale Corp over the latter's sale of diamond engagement rings bearing the "Tiffany" name.
In a 3-0 decision, the court agreed with Costco's argument that its use of the name "Tiffany" was unlikely to confuse customers. It also ruled that Costco may describe the style of its engagement rings even if confusion were likely.
Tiffany had sued Costco for trademark infringement in 2013 after an estimated 3,349 customers bought Tiffany-set rings at Costco during Valentine's Day season that year.
Costco countered that "Tiffany" had become a generic term, and claimed it had removed the "Tiffany" signage within a week after being contacted by that company.
The $21 million awarded to Tiffany, one of the world's most famous luxury retailers, included $11.1 million for lost profit due to the alleged infringement, $8.25 million in punitive damages, and interest.
