Fed Rate Hike Threatens Housing as U.S. Growth Leans on AI, Citi Says 
US-Led Coalition Targets Global Factory Overcapacity 
Gold Prices Fall as Stronger Dollar Weighs on Bullion 
Japan Real Wages Rise 1.5%, Supporting BOJ Rate Hikes 
DogecoinVM Makes DOGE Transactions 300x Faster 
Bitcoin Outflows From Binance Hit Three-Year High as Whales Accumulate 
European Stocks Fall as Oil Rises Ahead of Fed Minutes 
Fed’s Hammack Says Bond Yield Surge Is Not Driven by Inflation Fears 
China Shuts 670 Banks as Bitcoin Eyes Financial Risks 
Zcash Privacy Demand Rises as AI Exposes Bitcoin Transactions 
Circle Stock Falls 4% as Crypto Selloff Overshadows SAP Pay Expansion 
Australia Consumer Confidence Plunges as RBA Rate Hike Hits Households 
Asian Currencies Mixed as Yen Weakens, Dollar Holds Firm 
Add as a preferred source on Google
Numerous elements that influence the shift in the SNB’s FX stance, namely:
1) Economic performance is satisfactory and inflation continues to normalize (the rate of CPI inflation has increased by 1.5% from the 2015 low, putting it 0.4% above its 5Y average.
2) The SNB’s FX and gold reserves increased by 17% of GDP in 2016 to 114%. The SNB needs to be mindful of the fiscal risk inherent in a balance sheet of this size, especially considering potential investment losses from a trend to higher bond yields.
3) The Trump Administration is less accepting of FX manipulation. But what has US FX policy got to do with a small economy like Switzerland? The answer is that while small, Switzerland has a long and enduring history of FX intervention such that it is now the third largest holder of FX reserves (6% of global reserves for an economy which accounts for 0.9% of global GDP) and the fourth largest holder of UST (excluding offshore centres). Importantly also, Switzerland is one of only two countries that exceeds the threshold the US Treasury has set as prima facie evidence of currency manipulation -persistent, one-sided FX intervention exceeding 2% of GDP (Switzerland is at 10%, Taiwan 2.5%).
SNB intervention may be regarded as a legitimate expression of domestic monetary policy by some observers, but could equally be construed as manipulation by others. In view of this, it’s not an entirely fanciful suggestion that the SNB might be tapering intervention in order to the guard against the risk of being cited by the US Treasury as a currency manipulator.
Bullish scenarios:
1) The SNB continues to taper but at a faster pace.
2) The US Treasury cites Switzerland as a currency manipulator (April report?).
3) President Le Pen.
Bearish scenarios:
1) 3-4 Fed hikes encourages heavier capital outflows and a resumption of CHF funded carry trades.
2) Breakdown of EU talks over restrictions on free movement of labor.
