Ethiopian Airlines Expands Fleet with New Boeing 787 Dreamliner Order to Boost Global Routes 
Why Global Web3 Projects Can't Afford to Skip South Korea: TokenPost Unveils Data-Driven Entry Solutions 
PLS Reports Record Lithium Output as EV Demand Fuels Market Growth 
Organon Stock Surges After Reports of $13 Billion Buyout Bid by Sun Pharma 
Florida Launches Criminal Probe Into OpenAI Over FSU Shooting Incident 
Intel Stock Surges as AI Chip Demand Drives Strong Q2 Forecast 
Rising Jet Fuel Costs from Iran Conflict Push Airfare Higher Across Europe 
OPmobility Reports Q1 Revenue Dip Amid Automotive Industry Slowdown 
Mercedes-Benz Faces Rising Competition in China but Rejects Price War Strategy 
SK Hynix Reports Record Q1 Profit Surge Driven by AI Memory Chip Demand 
SpaceX Eyes $60B Cursor Deal to Boost AI Power Ahead of IPO 
Kakaku.com Stock Surges on EQT Takeover Interest Amid Rising Japan Deal Activity 
Daiichi Sankyo Stock Drops After Earnings Delay and Oncology Review 
Meta Expands AI Training With Employee Activity Tracking Tools 
Elon Musk Signals Intel 14A Chips for Tesla’s Terafab AI Semiconductor Venture 
Amazon Stock Rises as Meta Expands AWS Partnership for AI Infrastructure 
DeepSeek Launches V4 AI Models with Enhanced Reasoning and 1M Token Context Window 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, March 17, 2017 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Walter Investment Management Corp. (“Walter Investment” or the “Company”) (NYSE:WAC) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of a class consisting of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Walter Investment stock on the open market from May 3, 2016 through March 13, 2017, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to recover compensable damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting; and (2) as a result, Defendants’ statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects, were materially false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times. On March 14, 2017, the Company disclosed that there was a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting related to operational processes associated with Ditech Financial default servicing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016. On this news, shares of the Company fell $1.05 per share or over 38% to close at $1.65 per share on March 14, 2017, damaging investors.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than May 15, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
