Deutsche Bank Fined A$2 Million by ASIC Over OTC Derivatives Reporting Errors 
BHP Faces Major Port Hedland Strike as Labor Talks Stall Ahead of Production Report 
Nippon Paint Reportedly Offers Up to €7.5 Billion for Akzo Nobel Decorative Paints Business 
SEB Q2 Profit Rises on Strong Lending, Record Fee Income, Announces New Share Buyback 
SK Hynix Stock Soars as AI Memory Demand Outlook Fuels Chip Rally 
Alibaba Stock Jumps as China Approves Apple Intelligence Powered by Qwen AI 
Samsung to Launch First Yongin Chip Plant by 2029 as South Korea Speeds Up Semiconductor Hub 
Stellantis Q2 Vehicle Shipments Rise 10% as North America Drives Growth 
ASML Raises 2026 Outlook as AI Chip Demand Lifts Q2 Earnings 
SoftBank Corp Partners With Sierra to Expand AI Customer Support Across Japan 
Muji Owner Ryohin Keikaku Stock Soars After Raising Full-Year Earnings Forecast 
Australia Flags Child Safety Gaps at Apple, Meta, Google Over Online Sexual Extortion 
DBS Targets S$1 Trillion Wealth AUM by 2030 Amid Asia Wealth Boom 
Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Faces Lawsuit From 12 States 
Morgan Stanley Says China’s Reusable Rocket Progress Poses Long-Term Challenge to SpaceX 
Yaskawa Electric Shares Slide as Weak Profit Overshadows Strong AI Demand 
Apple Intelligence Cleared for China as Alibaba and Baidu AI Power iPhone Features 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Jan. 15, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against GoPro, Inc. (“GoPro” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:GPRO) in the United District Court for the Northern District of California on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased GoPro securities between July 21, 2015 through January 13, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”). This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that Defendants issued materially false and misleading statements to investors and/or failed to disclose that: (1) GoPro was experiencing weak sales of its HERO line of cameras; (2) GoPro was experiencing weak HERO4 Session sales at the time the third Quarter guidance was announced; (3) GoPro’s third quarter 2015 guidance was based on the assumption that GoPro would be able to sell a significant additional amount of HERO4 Session cameras; (4) GoPro’s third and fourth quarter 2015 guidance was inflated and unrealistic; and (5) as a result, Defendants’ statements about GoPro’s business, operations, and prospects were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 14, 2016. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
