Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban Sparks Global Debate and Early Challenges 
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case 
Mizuho Raises Broadcom Price Target to $450 on Surging AI Chip Demand 
Nvidia Develops New Location-Verification Technology for AI Chips 
Microsoft Unveils Massive Global AI Investments, Prioritizing India’s Rapidly Growing Digital Market 
Australia Enforces World-First Social Media Age Limit as Global Regulation Looms 
SoftBank Shares Slide as Oracle’s AI Spending Plans Fuel Market Jitters 
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform 
Trump Criticizes EU’s €120 Million Fine on Elon Musk’s X Platform 
SUPERFORTUNE Launches AI-Powered Mobile App, Expanding Beyond Web3 Into $392 Billion Metaphysics Market 
Trump’s Approval of AI Chip Sales to China Triggers Bipartisan National Security Concerns 
SpaceX Reportedly Preparing Record-Breaking IPO Targeting $1.5 Trillion Valuation 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns 
There was a recent report that Google was apparently tracking user locations even when they have disabled location tracker on their devices. This was then picked up by other publications, thus spreading the narrative that the search engine giant knows where users are whether they want to be found or not. On the other hand, there are also publications saying that this is simply not the case and the original report was wrong.
The news that Google was supposedly collecting data on users’ locations was first broken by Quartz. According to the publication, even when users turn off their location tracker, not use any apps, or even have no SIM card inserted in their devices, the search engine company could still know their location.
Apparently, this was due to the cell towers that receive the signals of their phones, which would then send it to Google. In response, a Google spokesperson told Quartz via email that this has been the case for the past 11 months and the information was never actually stored. Furthermore, the practice is set to end by the end of November.
“In January of this year, we began looking into using Cell ID codes as an additional signal to further improve the speed and performance of message delivery,” the email reads. “However, we never incorporated Cell ID into our network sync system, so that data was immediately discarded, and we updated it to no longer request Cell ID.”
Not everyone sees this development the way Quartz does, however, as Mashable published its own take on the matter. According to the publication, Google was not actually tracking the location of users with the data collected by the cell towers.
The difference reportedly hinges on the matter of the Cell ID being collected, which apparently does not engage GPS. As a result, Google could not use the information to find out the coordinates of the users. What’s more, a Google spokesperson also told Mashable that the Cell ID is encrypted is discarded immediately after receiving it.
