Moody's Investors Service says that guidelines issued by China's State Council earlier this month indicate a credit-positive willingness to address the risks posed by high corporate leverage. How the guidelines are implemented will determine their credit implications across sectors.
Moody's conclusions were contained in a just-released report, "China credit - State Council Guidelines Indicate Credit-Positive Willingness to Address Risks Posed by High Corporate Debt".
China's State Council published two guidelines on 10 October. The measures outlined in the guidelines include mergers and acquisitions, revitalization of stock assets, securitization of performing and nonperforming assets, optimization of debt structures, debt-equity swaps, developments of equity financing, regulation of the bankruptcy process, and strengthening of corporate governance.
Moody's sees two potential challenges to their implementation. First, in the near term, the deleveraging that these measures seek could lower GDP growth. However, Moody's expects that the current context of proactive fiscal policy and prudent monetary policy, which the guidelines re-assert, will mitigate this near-term effect.
The second set of challenges is related to the absence of a deep and liquid equity market, a pricing framework for equity in the debt swaps, or relevant legal framework (including a transparent and predictable bankruptcy process).
The market-oriented principles emphasized in the guidelines, if thoroughly implemented, will introduce safeguards to reduce the risk of banks swapping non-viable companies' debt for equity at a price that would leave them exposed to sharp falls in valuations. Meanwhile, the asset management companies may need new equity injections, particularly if book values are broadly retained.
The report says that it is likely that, through some of the measures envisaged, some of the leverage currently on corporate balance sheets is shifted to other parts of the economy, including the banks and asset management companies. Moreover, the government and the public sector in general would also take some of the costs, either directly or indirectly through the provision of policy support.
The credit implications for the sovereign will depend on whether the measures effectively reduce the economy-wide contingent liability risks for the government posed by state-owned enterprises, banks and asset management companies.


Trump’s "Shock and Awe" Agenda: Executive Orders from Day One
Gold Prices Slide as Rate Cut Prospects Diminish; Copper Gains on China Stimulus Hopes
U.S. Banks Report Strong Q4 Profits Amid Investment Banking Surge
2025 Market Outlook: Key January Events to Watch
U.S. Treasury Yields Expected to Decline Amid Cooling Economic Pressures
Bank of America Posts Strong Q4 2024 Results, Shares Rise
Stock Futures Dip as Investors Await Key Payrolls Data
US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts
Moody's Upgrades Argentina's Credit Rating Amid Economic Reforms
U.S. Stocks vs. Bonds: Are Diverging Valuations Signaling a Shift?
Gold Prices Fall Amid Rate Jitters; Copper Steady as China Stimulus Eyed
Moldova Criticizes Russia Amid Transdniestria Energy Crisis
US Gas Market Poised for Supercycle: Bernstein Analysts
Goldman Predicts 50% Odds of 10% U.S. Tariff on Copper by Q1 Close
Global Markets React to Strong U.S. Jobs Data and Rising Yields
Oil Prices Dip Slightly Amid Focus on Russian Sanctions and U.S. Inflation Data
UBS Predicts Potential Fed Rate Cut Amid Strong US Economic Data 



