Moody's Japan K.K. has published a rating methodology for trading companies.
The methodology seeks to provide a transparent presentation of the rating considerations that are usually most important for companies in this sector and incorporates refinements in Moody's analysis that better reflect the key credit fundamentals of the industry.
The methodology includes a detailed rating grid and illustrative examples that compare the mapping of rated companies against the factors in the grid. The grid contains four factors that are important in Moody's analysis of trading companies: Scale (20% weighting); Business Profile (30%); Leverage (20%); and Financial Policy (30%).
The grid is a reference tool that can be used to approximate credit profiles within the general and commodity trading industry in most cases. The grid scoring presents an approximate summary that does not include every rating consideration.
Moody's currently rates 12 trading companies, including seven general trading companies (GTCs) and five commodity trading companies (CTCs), with approximately $44 billion in rated debt. The global rated universe covers a wide range of products and business models.
The seven GTCs are all Japanese. These "sogo shosha" have an important position in the Japanese economy and very close relationships with key domestic banks. The broad credit environment in Japan has tended to be supportive of such prominent companies and these credit considerations are not fully reflected in the characteristics scored in the grid, which is designed to apply globally. However, our ratings consider these additional favorable credit considerations as part of our qualitative assessment of each company.
There are five rated commodity trading companies, which are involved in the sourcing, handling, transportation, and merchandising of commodities. These commodities primarily fall into three areas - agriculture, energy and metals. Additionally, these companies have significant investments in logistics assets (silos, warehouses, storage tanks, port facilities, etc.) that enable them to extract additional value versus brokers or agents. These companies differ from most corporate issuers in their extensive use of derivatives (both on and off-exchange futures and options) and varying levels of proprietary trading to enhance margins. In addition, many of these companies have very liquid but more volatile balance sheets relative to other industrial companies.
Subscribers can access the rating methodology "Trading Companies" at: http://www.moodys.com/viewresearchdoc.aspx?docid=PBC_179476


US Gas Market Poised for Supercycle: Bernstein Analysts
U.S. Banks Report Strong Q4 Profits Amid Investment Banking Surge
Gold Prices Fall Amid Rate Jitters; Copper Steady as China Stimulus Eyed
Goldman Predicts 50% Odds of 10% U.S. Tariff on Copper by Q1 Close
Geopolitical Shocks That Could Reshape Financial Markets in 2025
S&P 500 Relies on Tech for Growth in Q4 2024, Says Barclays
Stock Futures Dip as Investors Await Key Payrolls Data
U.S. Treasury Yields Expected to Decline Amid Cooling Economic Pressures
2025 Market Outlook: Key January Events to Watch
Trump’s "Shock and Awe" Agenda: Executive Orders from Day One
Lithium Market Poised for Recovery Amid Supply Cuts and Rising Demand
Global Markets React to Strong U.S. Jobs Data and Rising Yields
Fed May Resume Rate Hikes: BofA Analysts Outline Key Scenarios
Moldova Criticizes Russia Amid Transdniestria Energy Crisis
Moody's Upgrades Argentina's Credit Rating Amid Economic Reforms
US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts
European Stocks Rally on Chinese Growth and Mining Merger Speculation 



