SpaceX Sets IPO Price at $135 Per Share Ahead of Historic Nasdaq Debut 
Chicago U.S. Attorney Drops Charges Against Broadview Protest Defendants 
Atlas Renewable Energy Freezes $1 Billion Brazil Investment Amid Renewable Energy Curtailment 
Kennedy Center Ordered to Remove Trump Name Following Federal Court Ruling 
MongoDB Q1 FY2027 Earnings Beat Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook 
TSMC Sees Strong AI-Driven Growth as Demand for Advanced Chips Continues to Surge 
Supreme Court Blocks 5th Circuit Ruling on Abortion Pill Access 
US Appeals Court Allows Trump Military Enlistment Ban on Transgender Recruits, Protects Current Service Members 
Palo Alto Networks Q3 FY2026 Earnings Surge on Strong AI Security Demand, Raises Full-Year Outlook 
Anthropic Files for IPO, Signaling a New Era for Public AI Investments in 2026 
Meta Delays Release of New AI Model as API Rollout Remains Uncertain 
DOJ Sues UCLA Over Alleged Antisemitism and Hostile Campus Environment 
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury 
Sable Offshore Wins Key Court Battle Over California Oil Pipeline 
Apollo Ends Pursuit of Bodycote, Withdraws £1.52 Billion Takeover Proposal 
Lululemon Cuts 2026 Outlook as Weak North America Sales Pressure Growth 
A U.S. jury has ruled that OpenAI is not liable in a lawsuit brought by Elon Musk, marking a major legal victory for the artificial intelligence company. The verdict was delivered Monday in a federal court in Oakland, California, after jurors concluded that Musk filed the lawsuit after the legal deadline had expired.
The case centered on Musk’s allegations that OpenAI abandoned its original nonprofit mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. Musk claimed the ChatGPT creator shifted toward profit-driven goals that primarily benefited executives and investors rather than the public. He also accused Microsoft of knowingly supporting OpenAI’s alleged focus on financial gain over AI safety and ethical development.
Following the verdict, Musk announced on X that he plans to appeal the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Musk argued that the court never addressed the substance of the case and instead dismissed it on what he described as a “calendar technicality.” He further accused OpenAI executives Sam Altman and Greg Brockman of enriching themselves by transforming what he called a charitable organization into a profit-focused enterprise.
The highly watched trial began on April 28 and lasted 11 days. During proceedings, OpenAI maintained that Musk’s claims were legally outdated and motivated by financial interests. OpenAI’s legal team argued that the company had always acted within its organizational framework while continuing to develop advanced AI technologies responsibly.
Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 and invested roughly $38 million before leaving the board in 2018, argued that the company violated its original nonprofit agreement by transitioning into a for-profit structure. His legal team also questioned the credibility of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman during closing arguments.
The lawsuit highlighted growing global debate over artificial intelligence, AI safety, corporate influence, and who should financially benefit from rapidly advancing AI technologies.
