Maersk Vessel Successfully Transits Red Sea After Nearly Two Years Amid Ongoing Security Concerns 
FTC Praises Instacart for Ending AI Pricing Tests After $60M Settlement 
JPMorgan’s Top Large-Cap Pharma Stocks to Watch in 2026 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
FedEx Beats Q2 Earnings Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook Despite Stock Dip 
Trump Signals Push for Lower Health Insurance Prices as ACA Premium Concerns Grow 
Boeing Seeks FAA Emissions Waiver to Continue 777F Freighter Sales Amid Strong Cargo Demand 
ByteDance Plans Massive AI Investment in 2026 to Close Gap With U.S. Tech Giants 
Moore Threads Unveils New GPUs, Fuels Optimism Around China’s AI Chip Ambitions 
Bridgewater Associates Plans Major Employee Ownership Expansion in Milestone Year 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Saks Global Weighs Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Debt Pressures and Luxury Retail Slowdown 
Novo Nordisk Stock Surges After FDA Approves Wegovy Pill for Weight Loss 
John Carreyrou Sues Major AI Firms Over Alleged Copyrighted Book Use in AI Training 
Niigata Set to Approve Restart of Japan’s Largest Nuclear Power Plant in Major Energy Shift 
AstraZeneca’s LATIFY Phase III Trial of Ceralasertib Misses Primary Endpoint in Lung Cancer Study 
NEW YORK, Oct. 14, 2016 -- The Law Offices of Vincent Wong announce that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the USDC for the District of Minnesota on behalf of investors who purchased Polaris Industries Inc. (NYSE:PII) securities between January 26, 2016 and September 11, 2016.
Click here to learn about the case: http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc. There is no cost or obligation to you.
According to the complaint, during the Class Period, Polaris made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Polaris was unable to sufficiently validate the initially identified repair for certain of its recalled RZR vehicles; (2) that the Company would ultimately need to implement a more complex and expensive repair solution; (3) that the financial impact of RZR vehicle recalls was greater than the Company had disclosed to investors; (4) that Polaris overstated its full-year 2016 guidance.
Polaris announced multiple recalls for numerous vehicles in 2015 and 2016. Then in July 2016, Polaris issued a stop-ride/stop-sale advisory pending the recall of another vehicle, citing fire hazards. Then on September 12, 2016, Polaris lowered its earnings guidance range for the full year 2016 from $6.00 per share to between $3.30 and $3.80 per share.
If you suffered a loss in Polaris Industries you have until November 15, 2016 to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Vincent Wong, Esq. either via email [email protected], by telephone at 212.425.1140, or visit http://www.wongesq.com/pslra/polaris-industries-inc.
Vincent Wong, Esq. is an experienced attorney that has represented investors in securities litigations involving financial fraud and violations of shareholder rights. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
CONTACT: Vincent Wong, Esq. 39 East Broadway Suite 304 New York, NY 10002 Tel. 212.425.1140 Fax. 866.699.3880 E-Mail: [email protected]
