A federal judge has dismissed a 2019 lawsuit against Starbucks, filed by Balmuccino LLC, accusing the coffee giant of stealing its coffee-flavored lip balm trade secrets. The judge ruled that Balmuccino LLC waited too long to file the case in federal court.
The trade secret claim against Starbucks is over after a federal judge dismisses the lawsuit on technical grounds. The case was said to have been filed after the company launched its S'mores Frapuccino lip gloss in 2019.
According to Courthouse News Service, Starbucks was cleared because the complainant, Balmuccino LLC, waited too long to file the lawsuit in federal court. The latter sued SB for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. Still, U.S. District Judge John Chun explained that the case was tossed out because of the lack of jurisdiction over Starbucks since it was filed in a state court in California.
The judge sided with Starbucks after applying Washington state law instead of the more lenient California state law. He referred to the former to answer whether Balmuccino could still go after its claims after the statute of limitations expired.
"Balmuccino draws on California's more forgiving tolling law to argue that declining to toll the statutes of limitations during the pendency of the state-court action is bad public policy," Judge Chun stated. "Balmuccino may have a point that requiring a plaintiff to concurrently file separate actions in two different jurisdictions is inefficient and laborious. Yet this is the tolling policy that Washington has apparently adopted."
He added, "Even assuming that Balmuccino reasonably asserted personal jurisdiction in California at the outset of litigation, Balmuccino was on notice that it might need to file elsewhere at least as of June 2020, prior to the expiration of the limitations periods lessens the force of its policy argument that it would be unfair or redundant to have to concurrently file multiple suits in multiple jurisdictions."
In response to the dismissal of the lawsuit, Reuters reported that Eduardo Martorell, Balmuccino's lawyer, said they think the case was wrongly decided, so they will appeal the decision or re-file the suit in New York. He added that they would not stop fighting until the courts allow Balmuccino to be heard on the merits.


Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back
The American mass exodus to Canada amid Trump 2.0 has yet to materialize
Debate over H-1B visas shines spotlight on US tech worker shortages
Gold Prices Edge Higher as Markets Monitor U.S.-Iran Peace Talks
Australia Urged to Simplify Regulations to Revive IPO Market and Boost Innovation
NIO CEO Says China’s Auto Industry Has Passed Its Golden Era Amid Weak Car Sales
Heritage, desire and diplomacy: why China still values scotch whisky
SpaceX Delays Starship V3 Launch Ahead of Potential Record IPO
Macquarie Names Five Taiwan AI Stocks Set to Benefit From Data Center Growth in 2026
Time to buy local: war fuel price shocks reveal the folly of a long food supply chain
Huawei Chip Breakthrough Sparks Rally in Chinese Semiconductor Stocks
Boeing Wins Fraud Lawsuit Over 737 MAX Filed by LOT Polish Airlines
Glastonbury is as popular than ever, but complaints about the lineup reveal its generational challenge
Can your cat recognise you by scent? New study shows it’s likely
UK Grocery Inflation Slows to 3.1% as Supermarket Price Pressures Ease in May 2026
Marvell Stock Rises After Record Q1 FY2027 Earnings Fueled by AI Demand
Asian Markets Slide as New U.S. Strikes on Iran Spark Investor Caution 



