HSBC Australia Faces A$35M Penalty Over Scam Protection Failures 
SK Hynix Shares Hit Record High After Shipping Next-Generation HBM4E AI Memory Samples 
Carro Expands Into Australia With Acquisition of Used-Car Platform CarPlace 
100+ Global Companies Push Governments to Prioritize Electrification for Economic Growth 
Obayashi to Acquire Multiplex in $526M Expansion Deal 
Frank Stronach Found Guilty of Sexual Assault and Indecent Assault in Ontario Court 
Kingboard Holdings Shares Surge After HK$11.77 Billion Block Trade to Expand PCB and AI Supply Chain Business 
BHP Shares Fall as Jansen Potash Project Costs Surge 
Saudi Aramco Explores Sulphur Business Stake Sale to Raise Billions 
Jio IPO Filing Nears as Reliance Targets $4 Billion Market Debut 
US Raises Concerns Over Possible ASML EUV Machine Transfer to China 
GM and Lockheed Martin Partner to Strengthen U.S. Defense Manufacturing Capacity 
US-Iran De-Escalation Shifts Washington’s Focus to AI Regulation and Crypto Legislation 
JPMorgan Sees Strong Strategic Value in Potential AbbVie Acquisition of Apogee Therapeutics 
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks 
Samsung Gains Interest from BYD, Google, AMD as AI Chip Demand Strains TSMC Capacity 
On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.
