US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges 
Hims & Hers Shares Fall as GLP-1 Costs Widen Q2 Loss 
Meta Ordered to Pay $567M Over Child Safety Violations in New Mexico 
Goldman Sachs Sees US Stock Buybacks Outpacing Equity Issuance as AI Funding Rises 
AMP Shares Surge 13% After Strong Profit and A$150 Million Buyback 
Alibaba Plans Revenue-Sharing Model for Qwen3.8-Max AI Commercial Users 
Daimler Truck Q2 Profit Falls 18%, 2026 Outlook Raised 
Nintendo Shares Jump as Switch 2 Sales Boost Earnings 
OpenAI Restricts Astra AI Over Cyberattack Risks 
JPMorgan Plans More Asia-Pacific Hiring in 2027 as Corporate Banking Revenue Surges 
Shein Scales Back Vietnam Operations as US Trade Rules Shift 
Nvidia to Invest Up to $3 Billion in Blackstone-Backed Lancium 
Berkshire Hathaway Cash Falls as Abel Boosts Stock Buybacks 
Deutsche Bank Upgrades Persimmon to Buy After Strong First-Half Results 
Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported 
Apple Tests China’s CXMT Memory Chips for iPhones and MacBooks Amid AI Supply Crunch 
UOB Q2 Net Profit Rises 10% as Wealth Management Growth Boosts Earnings 
On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.
