ExxonMobil to Shut Older Singapore Steam Cracker Amid Global Petrochemical Downturn 
Lockheed Martin Secures $1.14 Billion Contract Boost for F-35 Production 
Netflix Nearing Major Deal to Acquire Warner Bros Discovery Assets 
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp 
Airbus Faces Pressure After November Deliveries Dip Amid Industrial Setback 
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts 
Rio Tinto Raises 2025 Copper Output Outlook as Oyu Tolgoi Expansion Accelerates 
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature 
Momenta Quietly Moves Toward Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising China-U.S. Tensions 
Hikvision Challenges FCC Rule Tightening Restrictions on Chinese Telecom Equipment 
Sam Altman Reportedly Explored Funding for Rocket Venture in Potential Challenge to SpaceX 
Airline Loyalty Programs Face New Uncertainty as Visa–Mastercard Fee Settlement Evolves 
Boeing Acquisition of Spirit AeroSystems Could Close Soon Amid Ongoing Conditions 
Waymo Issues Recall After Reports of Self-Driving Cars Illegally Passing School Buses in Texas 
UPS MD-11 Crash Prompts Families to Prepare Wrongful Death Lawsuit 
On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.
