U.S. and Taiwan Strengthen AI, Semiconductor, and Drone Cooperation at High-Level Economic Talks 
U.S. Returns Seized Oil Tanker to Venezuela in Rare Policy Move 
Jerome Powell Attends Supreme Court Hearing on Trump Effort to Fire Fed Governor, Calling It Historic 
Trump Warns Minneapolis Mayor as Immigration Raids Continue Amid Rising Tensions 
EU-India Trade Deal Offers European Carmakers a New Opening in India’s Competitive Auto Market 
Kim Jong Un Signals Expanded Nuclear Plans Ahead of Workers’ Party Congress 
South Korea Industry Minister Heads to Washington Amid U.S. Tariff Hike Concerns 
Trump Weighs Military Options as Iran Tensions Rise 
Trump, Walz Seek De-Escalation After Minneapolis Deportation Crisis and Agent Shake-Up 
Israel Recovers Remains of Last Gaza Hostage, Advancing U.S.-Backed Plan to End War 
ICE Blocked From Entering Ecuador Consulate in Minneapolis During Immigration Operation 
California Governor Gavin Newsom Launches Review Into Alleged TikTok Content Suppression After U.S. Ownership Deal 
UK Politicians Call for Full Competition Review of Netflix’s Warner Bros Discovery Deal 
Trump Claims Breakthrough in Syria Talks After Call With President al-Sharaa 
Trump and Schumer Explore Deal on New Limits for Federal Immigration Agents 
Mark Carney Walks Back Davos Remarks After Call With Donald Trump, Says U.S. Treasury Secretary 
A high court in the United Kingdom ruled against the British government’s scheme regarding the resettlement of EU citizens. The court ruled that the plan was unlawful and breached the withdrawal agreement when the UK left the European Union.
Judge Peter Lane of London’s High Court ruled on Wednesday in favor of the Independent Monitoring Authority that oversees citizens’ rights in a lawsuit the group filed against the British government. The IMA argued that the UK is breaching its withdrawal agreement with the EU when it left the bloc by requiring EU citizens to reapply for the right to reside and work in the UK.
Lane said that the British government’s interpretation of the withdrawal agreement was “wrong in law” and that the scheme to require EU citizens to reapply was unlawful. Lane granted the Home Office permission to file an appeal.
Lawyers for the IMA argued during the hearing last month that the scheme unlawfully requires EU citizens to reapply after being allowed to stay in the UK or lose their rights of residence. EU citizens and their family members who have yet to establish a right of permanent residence in the UK before the end of 2020 can be granted a limited leave to enter and remain in the country for five years. This is also known as the “pre-settled status.”
However, attorney Robert Palmer, who is representing the IMA, argued that this part of the resettlement scheme for EU citizens was “straightforwardly incompatible with the withdrawal agreement.”
Home Office minister Simon Murray said the ministry will appeal Lane’s decision.
On Monday, two High Court judges ruled in favor of the British government, saying that the plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda was lawful. However, the judges also questioned whether the government considered the individual circumstances of those who are entering the UK with such claims.
A court hearing in the case is set for January, and appeals are likely going to be made.
The ruling follows the lawsuits filed by several asylum seekers, aid groups, and a union of border officials to block the Conservative government from enforcing a deportation agreement with Rwanda that would send refugees that arrive in the UK by boat to the East African nation.
