A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


Banks Consider $38 Billion Funding Boost for Oracle, Vantage, and OpenAI Expansion
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban
Australia Moves Forward With Teen Social Media Ban as Platforms Begin Lockouts
Baidu Cuts Jobs as AI Competition and Ad Revenue Slump Intensify
Intel Boosts Malaysia Operations with Additional RM860 Million Investment
Apple Leads Singles’ Day Smartphone Sales as iPhone 17 Demand Surges
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp
Amazon and Google Launch New Multicloud Networking Service to Boost High-Speed Cloud Connectivity
Apple Appoints Amar Subramanya as New Vice President of AI Amid Push to Accelerate Innovation
Apple Alerts EU Regulators That Apple Ads and Maps Meet DMA Gatekeeper Thresholds
Anthropic Reportedly Taps Wilson Sonsini as It Prepares for a Potential 2026 IPO
Firelight Launches as First XRP Staking Platform on Flare, Introduces DeFi Cover Feature
TSMC Accuses Former Executive of Leaking Trade Secrets as Taiwan Prosecutors Launch Investigation
ByteDance Unveils New AI Voice Assistant for ZTE Smartphones
Samsung Launches Galaxy Z TriFold to Elevate Its Position in the Foldable Smartphone Market
Vietnam’s Growing Use of Chinese 5G Technology Raises Western Concerns
Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 



