A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


SoftBank Shares Fall After $10 Billion OpenAI Investment
Robinhood Launches AI Agents for Automated Trading
Tencent Signs $7 Billion Oracle AI Chip Lease Deal
Samsung Invests $1 Billion in KKR’s Helix AI Infrastructure
Micron Forecast Tops Estimates as AI Memory Demand Stays Strong
DogeOS Launches Testnet to Bring DeFi Apps to Dogecoin
Amazon Eyes $8 Billion Nvidia Chip Spinoff to Fund AI Expansion
TD Cowen Starts SpaceX at Buy, Sees AI Compute Driving Growth
Polymarket Traders Bet on Trump AI Rename to ‘Super Intelligence’
OpenAI Investigates Rogue AI Agents After Data Leaks and Security Incidents
Apple CEO John Ternus Plans Major Overhaul
AI Agents Could Disrupt Financial Services, Bernstein Says
DeepSeek, Huawei Partner on Ascend AI Chip Programming Tools
Apple iPhone 18 Pro Sales Jump 12% in China
TSMC Accelerates 2nm Expansion as AI Chip Demand Surges
Vitalik Buterin Says Hegota Could Be Ethereum’s Last Conventional Fork 



