A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


NASA's Artemis II Mission: First Crewed Lunar Journey Since Apollo
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth
OpenAI Executive Shake-Up Ahead of Anticipated 2026 IPO
Britain Courts Anthropic Amid US Defense Department Dispute
Microsoft's $10 Billion Japan Investment: AI Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Push
China vs. NASA: The New Moon Race and What's at Stake by 2030
Apple's Foldable iPhone Faces Engineering Setbacks, Mass Production Timeline at Risk
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses
Australia's Social Media Ban for Under-16s Sparks Global Movement
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs
Apple Turns 50: From Garage Startup to AI Crossroads
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028
SpaceX Eyes Historic IPO at $1.75 Trillion Valuation
Samsung Electronics Posts Eightfold Profit Surge Driven by AI Chip Demand
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave 



