A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


Ford Targets Level 3 Autonomous Driving by 2028 with New EV Platform and AI Innovations
BTIG Initiates Buy on SoftBank as AI and Robotics Strategy Gains Momentum
Hyundai Motor Shares Surge on Nvidia Partnership Speculation
AMD Unveils Next-Generation AI and PC Chips at CES, Highlights Major OpenAI Partnership
FDA Limits Regulation of Wearable Devices and Wellness Software, Boosting Health Tech Industry
NASA and SpaceX Target Crew-11 Undocking From ISS Amid Medical Concern
Discord Confidentially Files for U.S. IPO, Signaling Major Milestone
EU Orders Elon Musk’s X to Preserve Grok AI Data Amid Probe Into Illegal Content
Samsung to Double AI-Powered Mobile Devices with Google Gemini in Global AI Race
Samsung Electronics Poised for Massive Q4 Profit Surge on Soaring Memory Chip Prices
Intel Unveils Panther Lake AI Laptop Chips at CES 2025, Marking Major 18A Manufacturing Milestone
Supreme Court to Hear Cisco Appeal on Alien Tort Statute and Human Rights Liability
Nvidia Unveils Rubin Platform to Power Next Wave of AI Infrastructure
Nvidia Appoints Former Google Executive Alison Wagonfeld as First Chief Marketing Officer
Samsung Electronics Hits Record High as AI Momentum Fuels Investor Optimism
FCC Approves Expansion of SpaceX Starlink Network With 7,500 New Satellites
SMIC Shares Climb as China Boosts Chipmaking Support Amid AI Optimism 



