A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


OpenAI Targets $600B Compute Spend as IPO Valuation Could Reach $1 Trillion
Apple to Begin Mac Mini Production in Texas Amid $600 Billion U.S. Investment Plan
OpenAI Hires Former Meta and Apple AI Leader Ruomin Pang Amid Intensifying AI Talent War
Hyundai Motor Group to Invest $6.26 Billion in AI Data Center, Robotics and Renewable Energy Projects in South Korea
Microsoft Gaming Leadership Overhaul: Phil Spencer Retires, Asha Sharma Named New Xbox CEO
Anthropic Resists Pentagon Pressure Over Military AI Restrictions
OpenAI Pentagon AI Contract Adds Safeguards Amid Anthropic Dispute
Amazon’s $50B OpenAI Investment Tied to AGI Milestone and IPO Plans
Snowflake Forecasts Strong Fiscal 2027 Revenue Growth as Enterprise AI Demand Surges
Samsung Stock Hits Record High on Nvidia HBM4 Supply Deal, Boosting AI Chip Rally
Pentagon Weighs Supply Chain Risk Designation for Anthropic Over Claude AI Use
Hyundai Motor Plans Multibillion-Dollar Investment in Robotics, AI and Hydrogen in South Korea
Synopsys Q2 Revenue Forecast Misses Expectations Amid China Export Curbs and AI Shift
Nvidia Earnings Preview: AI Growth Outlook Remains Strong Beyond 2026
Federal Judge Blocks Virginia Social Media Age Verification Law Over First Amendment Concerns 



