A new proposed law in the United Kingdom has once again triggered the debate on privacy of information. The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill released by British Home Secretary Theresa May last week would compel communications service providers (CSP) to “maintain permanent interception capabilities” and to retain relevant communications data for statutory purposes for twelve months.
To put it simply, it means that tech companies such as Apple, Google, Microsoft and others would not be able to offer advanced encryption that even they cannot decipher when required, The Telegraph explained.
May said that the use of investigatory powers is crucial to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. Powers to intercept communications, acquire communications data and interfere with equipment are essential to tackle child sexual exploitation, to dismantle serious crime cartels, take drugs and guns off our streets and prevent terrorist attacks, according to the document.
However, Jimmy Wales, Founder of Wikipedia, tweeted, “I would like to see Apple refuse to sell iPhone in UK if gov't bans end-to-end encryption. Does Parliament dare be that stupid?”
Apple, for years, has been strongly guarding its users’ data and refuses to add a “backdoor” as it undermines the protections built by it so far. Apple’s iMessages and FaceTime calls are protected by end-to end encryption across all devices.
”We can’t unlock your device for anyone because you hold the key — your unique password. We’re committed to using powerful encryption because you should know the data on your device and the information you share with others is protected”, Apple’s privacy statement reads.
Yahoo also shared its views via blog post that read, “Of most concern to us at this stage is the UK Government’s proposal to affirm extraterritorial jurisdiction over foreign service providers. National laws cannot solve an international problem. If emulated around the world, the UK Government’s extraterritoriality clause would create a chaotic legal environment and unpredictability for companies, users, and agencies.”
"Any law which bans end-to-end encryption will break data protection regulations and decrease security on the internet," The Telegraph quoted Nigel Hawthorn, European spokesperson at cloud security company Skyhigh Networks.


Switch Seeks $2 Billion Funding at Nearly $50 Billion Valuation Ahead of Potential IPO
Samsung to Invest $90 Billion in South Korea to Expand AI Chip, Display, and Battery Production
South Korea Alleges Google Abused Android App Store Dominance, Eyes Major Fine
SpaceX Stock Draws Bullish Wall Street Coverage Ahead of Nasdaq-100 Inclusion
Apple Expands iPhone Lineup, Boosts Foldable iPhone Production Plans Through 2027
OpenAI Proposes 5% U.S. Government Stake Amid AI Policy Talks
ShareChat Eyes 2027 IPO After Reaching Operational Profitability, Report Says
Meta CEO Zuckerberg Says AI Agent Development Has Slowed Despite Massive AI Investment
LG Energy Solution Q2 Profit Plunges 77% Despite Revenue Growth on Weak EV Demand
AI can be a personal trainer in your pocket – but is it safe?
Anthropic Restores Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 After U.S. Lifts AI Export Controls
Smartphones are helping filmmakers tell the stories the movie industry overlooks
Meta Says States Seek $1.4 Trillion in Penalties Over Teen Social Media Addiction Lawsuit
AI Memory Chip Shortage Likely to Persist Despite Korea Investment Boom, Nomura Says
Foxconn Q2 Revenue Surges Nearly 40% on Strong AI Server Demand 



