This week marks the start of the Supreme Court confirmation hearings at the US Senate for President Joe Biden’s nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. Jackson appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where the lawmakers weighed her nomination.
Jackson appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday to defend her career as lawmakers from both sides weighed her nomination to the high court. If confirmed, Jackson will be succeeding Justice Stephen Breyer, who will be retiring this year and become the first Black woman to sit at the Supreme Court bench.
“I have been a judge for nearly a decade now, and I take that responsibility and my duty to be independent very seriously,” said Jackson during her testimony. “I decide cases from a neutral posture. I evaluate the facts and I interpret and apply the law to the facts of the case before me, without fear or favor, consistent with my judicial oath.”
Monday’s hearing marks the first of four days of hearings at the Senate, after hours of opening statements from each member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Lawmakers will begin to question Jackson in the next three days.
Democrats in the committee lauded Jackson’s career, while Republicans predictably raised concerns on some of Jackson’s past rulings and judicial philosophy. Jackson’s hearings also come as the Democratic-controlled Senate can confirm her even without support from Republicans.
“This is a momentous occasion and you have much to be proud of,” said Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, who chairs the committee. Durbin also pushed back on the criticism coming from Republicans who claim that Jackson is “soft on crime” and those who say that Jackson will serve as a “rubber stamp” for the Biden administration. Durbin said such claims were “baseless.”
Among the Republican lawmakers that have tried to levy such criticism towards Jackson is Missouri senator Josh Hawley, who accused Jackson of arguing that certain child pornography offenders are not as serious. However, according to columnist Steve Benen in a piece for MSNBC, Hawley’s attempt to smear Jackson ended up backfiring.
Benen explained that once Hawley tried to make such accusations towards Jackson, many fact-checkers immediately dismantled his claims.
Benen cited the conclusions of fact-checkers from the Associated Press, CNN, and the Washington Post, who all came to the same conclusion that Hawley’s accusations “don’t stand up to scrutiny.”
Ian Millheiser of Vox also called Hawley’s claims “genuinely nauseating,” while Andrew McCarthy of the conservative National Review said that the Missouri Republican’s attempt to smear Jackson with the accusations “appears meritless to the point of demagoguery.”


Capital One Says AML Review Led to Closure of Trump Organization Accounts
Trump Announces Hamas Disarmament Deal Under Gaza Peace Plan
Former House Appropriations Chair Kay Granger Dies at 83
Taiwan Says U.S. Military Cooperation Is Stronger Than Many Realize
Spain Deploys Troops as Ceuta Faces Major Migrant Surge From Morocco
Trump-Backed Russia Sanctions Bill Faces House Hurdles Over Tariff Powers
Brazil Supreme Court Approves Probe Into Lula’s Son Over Health Ministry Lobbying Claims
Trump Says Iran Talks to Begin as Strait of Hormuz Deal Nears, Oil Prices Fall
Trump Weighs Iran Strikes as U.S. Embassies Issue Emergency Security Alerts
South Korea Reviews Border Drone Incident After Troops Mistake U.S. Aircraft for Potential Threat
DOJ Rescinds Anti-Weaponization Fund Ahead of Todd Blanche Senate Confirmation Vote
White House: No Weaponized Drones Seized at FIFA World Cup Venues Despite 700 Recoveries
Trump Says U.S. ICC Campaign Aims to Protect Netanyahu, Not Himself
Russian Border Drone Strike Kills Child in Belgorod, Injures Two Others
Iran Warns of Retaliation as Trump Threatens New Strikes, Oil Risks Intensify
HRW Accuses Russia’s Africa Corps of Deadly Airstrike on Mali Civilians 



