Dr John McGarry is a Reader in Law at Edge Hill University.
His research interests include all aspects of public law and legal theory. His publications include: Intention, Supremacy and the Theories of Judicial Review (Routledge, 2016); ‘The Importance of an Expansive Test of Standing’ (2014) 19(1) Judicial Review 60-64; ‘The Possibility and Value of Coherence’ (2013) 34(1) Liverpool Law Review 17-26; ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty’ Legal Studies (2012 )32(4) Legal Studies 577-599; and ‘Named, Shamed, and Defamed by the Police’ (2011) 5(3) Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 219-227. He is also the co-editor of two volumes of collected papers, with Dr Ian Bryan and Dr Peter Langford: The Foundation of the Juridico-Political: Concept Formation in Kelsen and Weber (Routledge, 2015) and The Reconstruction of the Juridico-Political: Affinity and Divergence in Kelsen and Weber (Routledge, 2016).
John is a member of the Society of Legal Scholars, the Socio-Legal Studies Association, the UK Constitutional Law Group and the Law and Courts Standing Group of the European Consortium for Political Research. He is also a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.

Why the case against the Human Rights Act is so weak
Aug 31, 2016 10:48 am UTC| Law
The Human Rights Act was enacted in 1998 and made the rights set down in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) part of UK law for the first time. The ECHR was drafted after World War II and places obligations on...