Former President Donald Trump was impeached the second time for inciting the violence of the mob that broke into the Capitol on January 6, 2021, on a bipartisan vote. A new book revealed that in the aftermath of the insurrection, Republican lawmakers apparently considered taking more serious measures to remove Trump from office.
In a new book by New York Times reporters Jonathan Martin and Alexander Burns, several Republican lawmakers have suggested taking more serious measures in removing the now-former president from office after the insurrection. One such measure was through invoking the 25th Amendment, considered by Republican Reps. Jaime Herrera Beutler and Dan Newhouse.
The invocation of the 25th Amendment – a law that permits the Cabinet to remove the president if they believe he is not mentally fit to serve – was also part of the conversation occurring in both the House and Senate Republican caucuses. Both Herrera Beutler and Newhouse voted to impeach Trump the second time, and both are facing challenges to their seats by Trump’s base of supporters in the midterm elections this year.
This follows the previous revelations of Congressional Minority Leaders Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell. McCarthy privately criticized Trump and planned to push for his resignation while also calling for the suspension of the social media platforms of the members of his caucus that have pushed “The Big Lie.” When McCarthy attempted to deny the revelations, Burns and Martin released the recordings.
According to the book, Herrera Beutler suggested another option to remove Trump by joining with the Senate Republican caucus in calling for the then-president’s resignation. Herrera Beutler also testified during the impeachment trials regarding Trump’s call with McCarthy when the insurrection took place.
Meanwhile, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security found that Trump’s acting DHS head Chad Wolf altered and delayed an intelligence report regarding Russia’s interference in the 2020 elections.
The initial report was originally expected to be released on July 9, 2020, but Wolf delayed the release. A whistleblower revealed that Wolf thought the assessment “made the president look bad.”
“The acting secretary participated in the review process multiple times despite lacking any formal role in reviewing the product, resulting in the delay of its dissemination on at least one occasion. The delays and deviation from I&A standard process and requirements put at risk of creating a perception and politicization,” said the report released by the OIG, noting that the I&A or the Office of Intelligence and Analysis agreed with the report.


Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
EU Delays Mercosur Free Trade Agreement Signing Amid Ukraine War Funding Talks
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review
Trump Expands U.S. Travel Ban to Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Sparking Economic Fears in the Caribbean
Trump Signals Progress in Ukraine Peace Talks Ahead of U.S.–Russia Meeting
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency
U.S. House Advances GOP Healthcare Bill as ACA Subsidies Near Expiration
Trump Administration Plans Major Increase in Denaturalization Cases for Naturalized U.S. Citizens
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade
Trump Attends Dover Ceremony Honoring U.S. Personnel Killed in Syria
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
U.S.-Russia Talks in Miami Raise Hopes for Potential Ukraine War Deal
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure
Putin Signals Possible Peace or Continued War in Ukraine at Major Year-End Address
Barham Salih Elected as Next UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Fernando Haddad Confirms He Will Not Run for Office in 2025, Signals Possible Exit as Brazil’s Finance Minister 



