Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
 - EconoTimes)
NEW YORK, Oct. 27, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Opus Bank (“Opus Bank” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ:OPB) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of purchasers of Orbital common stock between securities between July 28, 2014, and October 17, 2016, inclusive (the “Class Period”), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and financial prospects. The Complaint alleges that Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: (1) that a percentage of the Company’s loans were of inferior quality; (2) that the Company was over-representing the quality of the loans to the public; (3) that, as such, the Company failed to properly account for the loans in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”); (4) that, as a result, the Company would be forced to recognize large write-offs associated with the loans; (5) that the Company lacked adequate internal controls over accounting and financial reporting; and (6) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about Opus’s business, operations, and financial prospects, were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis.
The Company’s stock price has dropped from a November 2015 high of $39.89 to a current price of $20.23.
Investors who purchased or otherwise acquired shares during the Class Period should contact the Firm prior to the December 27, 2016 lead plaintiff motion deadline. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation or discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.
