NEW YORK, Feb. 12, 2016 -- Gainey McKenna & Egleston announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against OvaScience, Inc. (“OvaScience” or the “Company”) (Nasdaq:OVAS) in the Suffolk County Superior Court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Complaint alleges that officers and directors of OvaScience violated the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the Company’s January 8, 2015 Secondary Offering (the “Offering”) when they sold 2.3 million shares of common stock at an offering price of $50.00 per share
The Complaint alleges that the documents filed in connection with the Offering contained materially false and misleading statements and omissions, including that the approximately 150 patients that had received OvaScience’s AUGMENT procedure in 2014 did not achieve a pregnancy success rate that was significantly higher than the rate achieved without its AUGMENT procedure. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.
The truth began to emerge on March 26 and 28, 2015, when the company reported results of IVF clinics utilizing the AUGMENT procedure, disclosing a 53% and a 25% success rate, respectively. These success rates were comparable to the success rate achieved for a woman using IVF without AUGMENT. On March 30, 3015, a Wainwright & Co. analyst questioned the Company’s AUGMENT data pregnancy rate calculation, stating that an alternative representation of the data would result in a 35% success rate rather than the 53% success rate declared by OvaScience. Then, on April 6, 2015, the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation published an article that challenged the reported 53% clinical pregnancy rate. The article suggested that the AUGMENT procedure data did not achieve a significant success rate of clinical pregnancies compared to previous rates achieved without the Company’s AUGMENT procedure. On September 28, 2015, OvaScience issued a press release announcing that it does not expect to meet the 2015 goal of 1,000 AUGMENT treatment cycles. On this news, the Company stock fell by $5.95 per share, or over 40%, to close at $8.57 per share on September 29, 2015. The stock has plummeted by over 77% since its Offering.
If you wish to join the litigation, or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Thomas J. McKenna, Esq. or Gregory M. Egleston, Esq. of Gainey McKenna & Egleston at (212) 983-1300, or via e-mail at [email protected] or [email protected].
Please visit our website at http://www.gme-law.com for more information about the firm.


TikTok U.S. Deal Advances as ByteDance Signs Binding Joint Venture Agreement
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report
Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
Trump Signals Push for Lower Health Insurance Prices as ACA Premium Concerns Grow
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions
Oracle Stock Surges After Hours on TikTok Deal Optimism and OpenAI Fundraising Buzz
Boeing Seeks FAA Emissions Waiver to Continue 777F Freighter Sales Amid Strong Cargo Demand
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland
Delta Air Lines President Glen Hauenstein to Retire, Leaving Legacy of Premium Strategy
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround
FDA Fast-Tracks Approval of Altria’s on! PLUS Nicotine Pouches Under New Pilot Program
Harris Associates Open to Revised Paramount Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law
FedEx Beats Q2 Earnings Expectations, Raises Full-Year Outlook Despite Stock Dip
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties
Google and Apple Warn U.S. Visa Holders to Avoid International Travel Amid Lengthy Embassy Delays 



