Austan Goolsbee Signals Potential for More Fed Rate Cuts as Inflation Shows Improvement 
Silver Prices Hit Record High as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid U.S. Economic Uncertainty 
Robinhood Expands Sports Event Contracts With Player Performance Wagers 
RBA Unlikely to Cut Interest Rates in 2026 as Inflation Pressures Persist, Says Westpac 
OpenAI Explores Massive Funding Round at $750 Billion Valuation 
Environmental Group Sues to Block Trump Image on U.S. National Park Passes 
Federal Judge Declines to Immediately Halt Trump’s $300 Million White House Ballroom Project 
Trump Sues BBC for Defamation Over Edited Capitol Riot Speech Clip 
Shell M&A Chief Exits After BP Takeover Proposal Rejected 
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions 
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report 
Precious Metals Rally as Silver and Platinum Outperform on Rate Cut Bets 
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround 
U.S. Lifts Sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Amid Shift in Brazil Relations 
Canada Signals Delay in US Tariff Deal as Talks Shift to USMCA Review 
U.S. Homeland Security Ends TSA Union Contract, Prompting Legal Challenge 
New Zealand Business Confidence Hits 30-Year High as Economic Outlook Improves 
A US federal court dismissed the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust complaint against Facebook, as well as a related case brought by 48 state attorneys general in acquiring Instagram and WhatsApp.
Following the rulings, Facebook's shares rose over 4 percent on Monday, sending its market capitalization above $1 trillion for the first time.
The FTC, alongside attorneys general from 48 states, sued Facebook in December for engaging in a supposed strategy to eliminate threats to its monopoly, including its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014, which the FTC previously cleared.
The US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the FTC failed to prove its main contention that Facebook holds monopoly power in the US personal social networking market.
The court described FTC's complaint as legally insufficient for failing to plead enough facts to establish a necessary element of its claims, hence should be dismissed.
The court pointed out that the allegations do not even provide an estimated actual figure or range for Facebook’s market share over the past ten years, falling short of establishing that Facebook holds market power.
The court added that FTC’s Complaint says almost nothing concrete on how much power Facebook, and still has, in the product market, almost as if it expects the Court to simply agree on "the conventional wisdom that Facebook is a monopolist.”
But the court acknowledged that the FTC may be able to fix the weaknesses in its argument and left open the possibility for filing an amended complaint.
The court also disagreed with Facebook’s insistence that the FTC does not have the authority to question its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, which took place in 2012 and 2014.
It ruled that the FTC can still seek divestiture of these acquisitions if it succeeds in establishing Facebook’s monopoly power.
The court also dismissed the case filed by the state attorneys general, saying that the long delay between the acquisitions and the 2020 case filing was unprecedented on a state level.
It added that the argument about “Facebook preventing interoperability with competing apps" doesn't state a claim under the antitrust law, as such policy is not unlawful.
