In a final blow to Nike Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear its appeal against a patent decision favoring Adidas, effectively closing a long-standing legal battle over sneaker technology patents.
Now the U.S. Supreme Court reportedly rejected Nike’s appeal, and since it is already the highest tribunal, the long-standing legal battle with Adidas is now considered a solved case.
As per JD Journal, the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal filed by Nike, wherein it is seeking to overturn the decision of the Patent Office court. The verdict from the lower court was upheld by the bureau’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and apparently, the justices at the higher court made the same decision as well.
It was mentioned that the lawsuits between Nike and Adidas have been going on for years as they have been fighting over a number of patents related to the application of technology in their respective shoe designs. In fact, in 2012, the German sneaker and sportswear manufacturer petitioned the patent office tribunal to nullify one of Nike’s patents involving the seamless knitted upper parts of the sneakers.
At that time, the tribunal accepted the Air Jordan maker’s request to cancel parts of its patent but did not allow the firm to revise the patent. It was explained that it was declined based on the fact that there was an earlier publication that covered the same innovation which Nike is proposing as a substitute for some patent elements.
Reuters reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals, specializing in patent disputes, sent the case back to the board two times and finally dismissed Nike’s third appeal last year. The company told the court in March that the board should not have been allowed to scrap a substitute patent element as they please, based on reasonings that Adidas did not bring up at the time.
In any case, the latest decision of the Supreme Court not to review the case put a legal end to the proceedings - with finality. This is because the outcome has left Nike with no other way to pursue its patent case against Adidas in the U.S. judicial system.
Photo by: Lennart Uecker/Unsplash


Oil Prices Slip in Asia as 2026 Supply Glut Fears and Russia-Ukraine Talks Weigh on Markets
China’s Small Bank Consolidation Struggles as Profits Fall and Risks Persist
Biren Technology Targets Hong Kong IPO to Raise $300 Million Amid China’s AI Chip Push
Asian Technology and Chipmaking Stocks Slide as AI Spending Concerns Shake Markets
Trello Outage Disrupts Users as Access Issues Hit Atlassian’s Work Management Platform
Asian Stocks Slide as AI Valuation Fears and BOJ Uncertainty Weigh on Markets
iRobot Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Amid Rising Competition and Tariff Pressures
HSBC’s $13.6 Billion Take-Private Offer for Hang Seng Bank Gains Board Backing
Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools Raises U.S. National Security Concerns
Woolworths Faces Fresh Class Action Over Alleged Underpayments, Shares Slide
Fed Near Neutral Signals Caution Ahead, Shifting Focus to Fixed Income in 2026
Korea Zinc to Build $7.4 Billion Critical Minerals Refinery in Tennessee With U.S. Government Backing
Oil Prices Rebound as U.S.-Venezuela Tensions Offset Oversupply Concerns
South Korea Extends Bond Market Stabilization Measures Amid Rising Financial Risks
Japan PMI Data Signals Manufacturing Stabilization as Services Continue to Drive Growth
Japan Business Sentiment Hits Four-Year High, Boosting Expectations of BOJ Rate Hike
Coca-Cola’s Proposed Sale of Costa Coffee Faces Uncertainty Amid Price Dispute 



