DeepSeek Eyes China IPO as AI Startup Seeks $71 Billion Valuation in New Funding Round 
Mastercard Explores Sale of Majority Stake in UK Payments Firm Vocalink: Report 
DOJ Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Charges Against Gautam Adani in U.S. Court 
China Home Prices Fall Again in June Despite Slower Pace of Decline 
Trinidad Businessman Dominic Hadeed Appeals Detention Over Alleged Assassination Plot 
Asian Stocks Slide as Oil Surge, U.S.-Iran Tensions and Fed Rate Bets Weigh on Markets 
Yaskawa Electric Shares Slide as Weak Profit Overshadows Strong AI Demand 
Sara Duterte Impeachment Trial Opens, Putting 2028 Philippine Election in Focus 
European Stocks Slip as Middle East Tensions and Hormuz Threat Rattle Markets 
Amy Coney Barrett Faces Conservative Backlash After Key Supreme Court Rulings Against Trump 
South Korea’s KOSPI Triggers Trading Curb as AI Chip Stock Selloff Deepens 
US Supreme Court Strikes Down Hawaii Gun Carry Law on Private Property 
Apple Sues OpenAI, Former Employees Over Alleged Trade Secret Theft 
South Korea Central Bank Set to Raise Interest Rates as Inflation Stays Elevated 
Morgan Stanley Says China’s Reusable Rocket Progress Poses Long-Term Challenge to SpaceX 
Nippon Paint Reportedly Offers Up to €7.5 Billion for Akzo Nobel Decorative Paints Business 
Brazil Court Bars Flavio Bolsonaro From Visiting Jair Bolsonaro Ahead of Election 
The Texas Supreme Court on a 9-0 vote gave conservative activists another shot at suing the city of San Antonio for preventing Chick-fil-A from opening a restaurant in an airport due to its support of anti-LGBTQ causes.
The ruling overturned a lower court's dismissal of the complaint, allowing campaigners to cite enough facts to indicate the city was breaking a Texas legislation known as the "Save Chick-fil-A law," which prohibits governments from taking "adverse" actions against businesses because of their religious views.
After San Antonio's city council voted to exclude Chick-fil-A from an airport concession contract, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed the bill into law in 2019.
Soon after the law was approved, five conservative activists sued San Antonio, arguing that the city was breaking it because the city council's vote was based on Chick-fil-financial A's backing of Christian organizations opposed to same-sex marriage.
The plaintiffs' lawsuit, according to Justice Rebeca Aizpuru Huddle, failed to demonstrate a present breach, instead of focusing on the March 2019 vote, which predates the statute.
She stated that the vote alone does not imply that there is a "credible threat" of unfavorable action against Chick-fil-A today, allowing the city's government immunity to be waived under the legislation.
Huddle, on the other hand, believes the activists should be allowed to modify their case to include current infractions.
In a concurring judgment, Justice Jimmy Blacklock, joined by Justice John Devine, agreed that the issue should be reopened, but disputed that the 2019 vote was insufficient to demonstrate a current breach because it established "a forward-looking policy."
The court relegated the decision to the trial court.
