DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal 
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Indian Refiners Scale Back Russian Oil Imports as U.S.-India Trade Deal Advances 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
NEW YORK, Oct. 24, 2016 -- Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP (“Scott+Scott”) has filed an action in the United States District Court of Minnesota against UnitedHealth Group, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., UnitedHealthcare of Alabama, Inc., and OptumRX, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).
Defendants are health insurance companies along with pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”). The PBMs are retained by the health insurance companies, on behalf of the plan or third-party payors, to provide the pharmacy benefits to plan members, which includes, inter alia, establishing a formulary of drugs that will be covered, a network of pharmacies that will serve as participating pharmacies for plan participants to obtain their prescriptions, copayment amounts, coinsurance amounts, and deductibles.
Specifically, the action relates to Defendants engaging in a scheme to defraud plan members by artificially inflating the copayment of medically necessary prescription drugs well above the cost of the drug. Plan participants, including Plaintiff and the Class, pay inflated copayments to participating pharmacies in exchange for receiving their prescription drugs. Unbeknownst to the plan participants, Defendants artificially inflate the purported costs of the prescription drugs in the form of increased copayments and then “claw back,” or recoup, from the pharmacies a large portion of the copayments.
Class members are consumers who pay artificially inflated copayments for medically necessary, covered prescriptions that cost plan participants more than if they did not have insurance. If you would like addition information, please contact Michael Burnett of Scott+Scott ([email protected], (800) 404-7770, (860) 537-5537).
About Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP
Scott+Scott has significant experience in prosecuting major securities, antitrust, and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, foundations, individuals, and other entities worldwide.
CONTACT: Michael Burnett Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP (800) 404-7770 [email protected]
