Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO 
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links 
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine 
Nvidia Nears $20 Billion OpenAI Investment as AI Funding Race Intensifies 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Missouri Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Starbucks’ Diversity and Inclusion Policies 
TrumpRx Website Launches to Offer Discounted Prescription Drugs for Cash-Paying Americans 
NEW YORK, Oct. 24, 2016 -- Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP (“Scott+Scott”) has filed an action in the United States District Court of Minnesota against UnitedHealth Group, Inc., United Healthcare Services, Inc., UnitedHealthcare of Alabama, Inc., and OptumRX, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”).
Defendants are health insurance companies along with pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”). The PBMs are retained by the health insurance companies, on behalf of the plan or third-party payors, to provide the pharmacy benefits to plan members, which includes, inter alia, establishing a formulary of drugs that will be covered, a network of pharmacies that will serve as participating pharmacies for plan participants to obtain their prescriptions, copayment amounts, coinsurance amounts, and deductibles.
Specifically, the action relates to Defendants engaging in a scheme to defraud plan members by artificially inflating the copayment of medically necessary prescription drugs well above the cost of the drug. Plan participants, including Plaintiff and the Class, pay inflated copayments to participating pharmacies in exchange for receiving their prescription drugs. Unbeknownst to the plan participants, Defendants artificially inflate the purported costs of the prescription drugs in the form of increased copayments and then “claw back,” or recoup, from the pharmacies a large portion of the copayments.
Class members are consumers who pay artificially inflated copayments for medically necessary, covered prescriptions that cost plan participants more than if they did not have insurance. If you would like addition information, please contact Michael Burnett of Scott+Scott ([email protected], (800) 404-7770, (860) 537-5537).
About Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP
Scott+Scott has significant experience in prosecuting major securities, antitrust, and employee retirement plan actions throughout the United States. The firm represents pension funds, foundations, individuals, and other entities worldwide.
CONTACT: Michael Burnett Scott+Scott, Attorneys at Law, LLP (800) 404-7770 [email protected]
