Anta Sports Expands Global Footprint With Strategic Puma Stake 
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
Innovent Biologics Shares Rally on New Eli Lilly Oncology and Immunology Deal 
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Taiwan Says Moving 40% of Semiconductor Production to the U.S. Is Impossible 
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains 
DBS Expects Slight Dip in 2026 Net Profit After Q4 Earnings Miss on Lower Interest Margins 
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks 
SpaceX Pivots Toward Moon City as Musk Reframes Long-Term Space Vision 
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports 
On 12 March, the Bureau of Economic Security (abbreviated - BES) announced that it was requesting a special investigation into the case of the owner of IBOX Bank. On 13 March, Judge Volodymyr Marmash will consider this motion in the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv, kp.ua reports.
The defence believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash violate Ukrainian law.
The BES detectives are seeking to reopen the case against the owner of IBOX BANK, even though on 5 December 2024, the Supreme Court settled the issue once and for all in the criminal case against her and cancelled the illegal decisions made by the detective of the BES Territorial Office in the Lviv Region, thereby confirming the illegality of the prosecution’s actions in the said proceedings.
The defence of the accused believes that the BES detectives and Judge Marmash, by accepting such a motion for consideration, grossly violate Ukrainian law. After all, the deadline for pretrial investigation in the criminal proceedings against the owner of IBOX BANK has been exceeded by 3 months, which is unacceptable in cases of this category.
Thus, the defence emphasises that the BES’s attempts to reopen the case against the Bank’s management are accompanied by numerous violations of the criminal procedure. 'The prosecution is pursuing its selfish interests, which are not related to a legitimate investigation aimed at identifying the real criminals,' the defence comments.
Earlier, it was reported that it was the Lychakivskyi District Court that considers many cases initiated by the BES and the State Bureau of Investigation (abbreviated – SBI). It was suspected that such cases may be ordered, and their consideration may be managed in a ‘manual mode’ in order to blackmail the accused. It is noted that if such offences are found by the investigator and judge, the penalty may be up to 10 years in prison. If future investigations reveal signs of corruption offences in the actions of these individuals, the penalty may be significantly increased with the mandatory confiscation of property acquired due to such ‘legal’ activities.
As a reminder, it is the Lychakivskyi District Court of Lviv that has been considering the criminal case against the traitor Viktor Medvedchuk for more than two years. And the Presiding Judge of this Court, Mr Hryhorii Zhovnir, ensured that the case was heard in camera, thus listening to Medvedchuk's lawyers.
This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editors or management of EconoTimes.
