The United States Supreme Court justices and federal judges are now made to adhere to stricter public disclosure rules. The rules would require the judges to disclose free trips, meals, or gifts received following calls by lawmakers and judicial transparency advocates.
A letter from the federal judiciary’s administrative wing confirmed the changes the justices and the judges are now required to adhere to was published on Tuesday by Democratic Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee who has long called for ethics reforms at the Supreme Court. Whitehouse said the disclosure rules for the judiciary are more relaxed than other branches of government.
“These new rules will make it much harder for justices to travel, dine, hunt, or vacation for free at the private resort of a wealthy corporate executive – especially one with business before their court – and avoid disclosing that information to the public,” said Whitehouse in a statement.
The changes took effect on March 14 and were adopted by a panel of the Judicial Conference, the policy-making body of the judiciary. The details of the changes were revealed in a March 23 letter to Whitehouse by federal judge Roslynn Mauskopf, the director of the Administrative Office of the US Courts. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must disclose stays at commercial properties like hotels and resorts and gifts of hospitality paid for by an entity or third-party other than the provider.
However, judges still do not have to disclose gifts that include food, lodging, or entertainment extended by an individual for non-business purposes.
Whitehouse and other Democratic lawmakers have also introduced legislation that would require the Supreme Court to adopt a code of ethics, strengthen recusal standards for judges, and boost financial disclosure requirements. Last year, Congress passed legislation that further required judges to periodically disclose stock trades.
Meanwhile, a group of senior Democratic lawmakers is set to introduce legislation that would further ensure that weapons sales by the United States to foreign customers do not end up contributing to human rights abuses. The legislation, referred to as the Safeguard Act, would codify the new Conventional Arms Transfer policy that was introduced in February by the Biden administration to increase the emphasis on human rights concerns, according to information seen by Reuters.
Democratic senator Bob Menendez, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Gregory Meeks, the ranking Democrat in the House Foreign Affairs Committee, are leading the legislation with nine other congressional Democrats.


Thailand Vows Continued Military Action Amid Cambodia Border Clash Despite Trump Ceasefire Claim
Russian Drone Attack Hits Turkish Cargo Ship Carrying Sunflower Oil to Egypt, Ukraine Says
Zelenskiy Signals Willingness to Drop NATO Bid as Ukraine, U.S. Hold Crucial Peace Talks in Berlin
U.S. Soldiers Killed in ISIS Attack in Palmyra, Syria During Counterterrorism Mission
California, 18 States Sue to Block Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders
Bolivia Orders Pre-Trial Detention of Former President Luis Arce Over Embezzlement Probe
Thousands Protest in Brazil Against Efforts to Reduce Jair Bolsonaro’s Prison Sentence
Belarus Frees Opposition Leaders Maria Kalesnikava and Viktar Babaryka in U.S.-Brokered Deal
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
International Outcry Grows Over Re-Arrest of Nobel Laureate Narges Mohammadi in Iran
New Epstein Photos Surface Showing Trump as Lawmakers Near Document Release Deadline
Preservation Group Sues Trump Administration to Halt $300 Million White House Ballroom Project
Ukraine’s NATO Concession Unlikely to Shift Peace Talks, Experts Say
U.S. Intelligence Briefly Curtailed Information Sharing With Israel Amid Gaza War Concerns
Trump Signals Two Final Candidates for Fed Chair, Calls for Presidential Input on Interest Rates 



