Lorna Jane, an Australian activewear company, was recently fined AU$5 million after claiming that its new line of active clothing can stop the spread of COVID-19. The firm said that its clothing could eliminate the virus, thus preventing its spread.
According to BBC News, Lorna Jane released advertisements that say it is using a groundbreaking technology called LJ Shield for its clothing line. It was claimed that this could stop the "transfer of all pathogens."
What the court says on Lorna Jane’s claims
Based on the report, a judge said in a ruling that the company’s claim about LJ Shield is "exploitative, predatory and potentially dangerous." The legal action against Lorna Jane was filed by the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) after the firm started selling its clothing in July amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
The verdict was said to have been released by the federal court on Friday, July 23. The judge said that based on investigations, Lorna Jane has been telling the consumers it has a “reasonable scientific or technological basis" for its claims about its clothing with the LJ Shield.
However, the judge said there was actually no scientific basis for such a claim. For this false and misleading representation to the public, the court slapped the company with a hefty fine.
"This was dreadful conduct as it involved making serious claims regarding public health when there was no basis for them," chairman of the ACCC, Rod Sims, said. "The whole marketing campaign was based upon consumers' desire for greater protection against the global pandemic."
Lorna Jane accepts the judge’s decision
The company was said to have accepted the verdict but explained, it was also misled by its supplier. Lorna Jane claimed its supplier sold them a product that did not deliver what it claimed to be, and they are referring to what they called the LJ Shield technology that is supposed to be anti-viral and anti-bacterial.
Meanwhile, it was learned that this is not the first time that Lorna Jane was fined. As per The Guardian, just in July 2020, the company was fined $40,000 for its failure to seek proper approval for ads from the Therapeutic Goods Administration. As for this new issue, the company issued an apology for its customers while continuing to blame its supplier for the issue.


Gold Prices Slide Below $5,000 as Strong Dollar and Central Bank Outlook Weigh on Metals
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs
SpaceX Prioritizes Moon Mission Before Mars as Starship Development Accelerates
Alphabet’s Massive AI Spending Surge Signals Confidence in Google’s Growth Engine
SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Nvidia, ByteDance, and the U.S.-China AI Chip Standoff Over H200 Exports
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences
Baidu Approves $5 Billion Share Buyback and Plans First-Ever Dividend in 2026
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns
Dollar Steadies Ahead of ECB and BoE Decisions as Markets Turn Risk-Off
RBI Holds Repo Rate at 5.25% as India’s Growth Outlook Strengthens After U.S. Trade Deal
Gold and Silver Prices Rebound After Volatile Week Triggered by Fed Nomination
Ford and Geely Explore Strategic Manufacturing Partnership in Europe 



