Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Wistron Opens $700M Texas AI Factory to Build Nvidia GB300 Superchips
US Dollar Climbs to Weekly High as Middle East Tensions Lift Treasury Yields and Safe-Haven Demand
Ryanair Warns Summer Airfares May Stay Lower as Quarterly Profit Misses Estimates
Oil Prices Rise as Houthi Attacks on Saudi Tankers Heighten Middle East Supply Fears
Alphabet Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates as AI Spending, Google Cloud Growth Fuel Outlook
Samsung Cuts U.S. Consumer Electronics Jobs as Headquarters Moves to Texas
US Stock Futures Rise as AI Optimism Lifts Tech, 3M Jumps on Strong Earnings
GE Vernova Q2 Revenue Tops Estimates as Earnings Miss, Shares Slide Despite Higher 2026 Outlook
Australia Jobs Surge in June Strengthens Case for More RBA Rate Hikes
Scandinavian Tobacco Group Sells BREAK and Moro Brands to Japan Tobacco for €176 Million
India FMCG Q1 Earnings Preview: Higher Input Costs Likely to Weigh on Profit Margins
SpaceX Q2 Earnings on Aug. 4 Set Stage for Historic Insider Share Unlock
Gold Price Holds Above $4,130 as Fed Rate Outlook and Middle East Tensions Support Safe-Haven Demand
Wistron Opens $700M Texas AI Factory to Build Nvidia Superchips in U.S.
Intel, AMD Seek Long-Term China Server CPU Deals as AI Demand Drives Supply Crunch
Asian Stocks Rally on AI Spending Optimism as Middle East Tensions Push Oil to Six-Week High 



