Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Oil Prices Climb on Venezuela Blockade, Russia Sanctions Fears, and Supply Risks
Austan Goolsbee Signals Potential for More Fed Rate Cuts as Inflation Shows Improvement
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround
BoE Set to Cut Rates as UK Inflation Slows, but Further Easing Likely Limited
Republicans Raise National Security Concerns Over Intel’s Testing of China-Linked Chipmaking Tools
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand
Treasury Wine Estates Shares Plunge on Earnings Warning Amid U.S. and China Weakness
Dollar Holds Firm Ahead of Global Central Bank Decisions as Yen, Sterling and Euro React
Japan Exports to U.S. Rebound in November as Tariff Impact Eases, Boosting BOJ Rate Hike Expectations
Toyota to Sell U.S.-Made Camry, Highlander, and Tundra in Japan From 2026 to Ease Trade Tensions
Silver Prices Hit Record High as Safe-Haven Demand Surges Amid U.S. Economic Uncertainty
U.S. Stock Futures Edge Higher as Micron Earnings Boost AI Sentiment Ahead of CPI Data
Trump Orders Blockade of Sanctioned Oil Tankers, Raising Venezuela Tensions and Oil Prices
Apple Opens iPhone to Alternative App Stores in Japan Under New Competition Law
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation
Precious Metals Rally as Silver and Platinum Outperform on Rate Cut Bets 



