Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Global Markets Slide as AI, Crypto, and Precious Metals Face Heightened Volatility
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Bank of Japan Signals Readiness for Near-Term Rate Hike as Inflation Nears Target
Nintendo Shares Slide After Earnings Miss Raises Switch 2 Margin Concerns
Rio Tinto Shares Hit Record High After Ending Glencore Merger Talks
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Silver Prices Plunge in Asian Trade as Dollar Strength Triggers Fresh Precious Metals Sell-Off
Tencent Shares Slide After WeChat Restricts YuanBao AI Promotional Links
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering
Dow Hits 50,000 as U.S. Stocks Stage Strong Rebound Amid AI Volatility
AMD Shares Slide Despite Earnings Beat as Cautious Revenue Outlook Weighs on Stock
Australian Scandium Project Backed by Richard Friedland Poised to Support U.S. Critical Minerals Stockpile
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
Japan Economy Poised for Q4 2025 Growth as Investment and Consumption Hold Firm
Oil Prices Slip as U.S.–Iran Talks Ease Supply Disruption Fears
Oil Prices Slide on US-Iran Talks, Dollar Strength and Profit-Taking Pressure 



