Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Russia Approves Sberbank for Crypto Exchange Services
Ethereum Foundation-Linked Wallets Move $11.13M in ETH to Kraken
TSMC Profit Set to Surge 65% as AI Chip Demand Drives Record Earnings
Nasdaq Falls as Oil Prices Surge Ahead of Bank Earnings
Bank of America Predicts Yen Rebound as USD/JPY Faces Risks
Samsung, SK Hynix Shares Fall as China's CXMT Advances DRAM Technology
Morgan Stanley Predicts $10 Trillion RWA Market by 2030
Gold Prices Hit One-Week High as Oil Falls, Fed Rate Outlook Weighed
FAA Warns US Airlines Over Saudi Arabia Flight Risks
IMF, World Bank Meetings Face Global Economic Risks Amid Iran War
Oil Prices Fall as Russia Signals Higher Diesel Exports
Albertsons Seeks $9.3 Billion From Kroger Over Failed Merger
South Korea Blocks 27 Crypto Exchange Websites in Regulatory Crackdown
Moonshot AI Executives Seek Settlement Ahead of Hong Kong IPO
Trump Secures Russian Diesel Deal as US Fuel Prices Surge
PepsiCo Slashes Poppi Earnout Valuation as Growth Slows 



