Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


JPMorgan Plans More Asia-Pacific Hiring in 2027 as Corporate Banking Revenue Surges
Australia Sets New Minimum Pay, Insurance Rules for Gig Workers
Bank of America to Buy Up to 49.9% Stake in Jio Credit for $1.92 Billion
Trump Weighs Capital Gains Tax Cuts Ahead of Midterms
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026
Oil Prices Rise as Hormuz Tensions Threaten Global Supply
Singapore Raises 2026 GDP Growth Forecast as AI Demand Fuels Economy
Gold Prices Rise as Fed Rate Hike Bets Ease
Iran War Escalates as US, Houthis Target Ships Near Key Oil Routes
Asian Stocks Mixed as RBA Holds Rates, Oil Risks Rise
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake
Oil Prices Slide as OPEC, IEA Cut 2026 Demand Forecasts
Google Pushes Gemini AI Overhaul as Sergey Brin Targets Model Supremacy
Maersk Raises 2026 Earnings Outlook as Shipping Profits Beat Expectations
Nvidia Secures $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Push With Wall Street Giants
Dollar Steady as Markets Await U.S. Inflation Data
Asian Currencies Steady Ahead of US CPI as Oil Prices Rise 



