Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


Kremlin Says New EU Sanctions Won’t Hurt Russian Banks
Dollar Stabilizes as Markets Weigh Middle East Ceasefire Prospects and Central Bank Policy Outlook
Changchun Targets EV Growth as China’s Auto Industry Consolidation Accelerates
US Stock Futures Rally as U.S.-Iran Peace Talks Boost Market Sentiment Despite Ongoing Strikes
Roku Explores Sale Options as Interest Grows in Streaming and Ad Business
Trump Says Iran Peace Deal Near as Markets Rally and Oil Prices Fall
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
Gold Prices Slide Toward Second Weekly Loss as Fed Rate Hike Expectations Weigh on Market
Woodside Energy Acquires PetroChina’s Browse Stake, Expands Position in Major Australian Gas Project
Adobe Beats Q2 2026 Estimates, Raises Full-Year Outlook as AI Revenue Surges Despite Stock Drop
EngineAI Files for Hong Kong IPO Amid Rising Demand for AI and Robotics Stocks
Exxon Mobil Set to Appoint Alex Volkov as Global Trading Chief
Alibaba Offers $1.5 Billion to Acquire Grocery Delivery Platform Pupu
Frasers Group Launches €2 Billion Hugo Boss Takeover Offer Amid Control Speculation
Gold Prices Drop as Strong Dollar, Rising U.S.-Iran Tensions Weigh on Market Sentiment
SK Hynix Stock Rebounds as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Expansion Plans
European Stocks Rise Ahead of ECB Rate Decision as Investors Buy the Dip 



