Ben & Jerry's, the popular ice cream brand, has brought its parent company, Unilever, to court in an attempt to stop the sale of its business in Israel. The British consumer goods company headquartered in London previously revealed it sold its ice cream biz to a local company, Avi Zinger.
Now it appears that Ben & Jerry's did not agree with the decision, so it is trying to cancel the sale deal. Unilever has made a deal with Avi Zinger so that the sale of Ben & Jerry's ice cream products can continue in the West Bank. Avi Zinger will serve as Unilver's distribution partner, but the ice cream maker filed a complaint regarding this deal.
CNN Business reported that Ben & Jerry's filed a lawsuit against Unilever on Tuesday, July 5, at the US District Court in New York. In its complaint, it is seeking an injunction against its parent company to protect its own brand and social integrity that it has spent many years building.
The ice cream company has been operating in Israel since 1987, but it encountered some issues recently after selling its products in West Bank settlements which Israel considers illegal under international law. The pressure from the issue has led the company to announce that it will no longer sell or bring its ice cream to the area.
The decision set off a conflict with American Quality Products (AQP), Ben & Jerry's longtime distributor in Israel, which sued the ice cream maker and Unilever in March. AQP stated that the companies were "unlawfully terminating its 34-year business relationship in order to boycott Israel."
Unilever is trying to soothe the situation and end the controversies by announcing last week that it sold Ben & Jerry's Israeli business to AQP. The amount of the deal remained unknown up to this day.
With the sale, Ben & Jerry's will be marketed in the Israel and West Bank region under its Hebrew and Arabic names. In the court filing, the ice cream company revealed that the sale came as a big surprise to its board, and its chairman was left stunned after hearing the news. The board then decided to sue Unilever for its actions after five board directors voted to authorize the lawsuit.
As per CNBC, a judge denied Ben & Jerry's application for a temporary restraining order but commanded Unilever to show cause by July 14. It should explain why the court should not issue a preliminary injunction. Meanwhile, Unilever said in a statement that the deal is already closed.


SpaceX Pushes for Early Stock Index Inclusion Ahead of Potential Record-Breaking IPO
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit
China Extends Gold Buying Streak as Reserves Surge Despite Volatile Prices
Hims & Hers Halts Compounded Semaglutide Pill After FDA Warning
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate
Vietnam’s Trade Surplus With US Jumps as Exports Surge and China Imports Hit Record
Russian Stocks End Mixed as MOEX Index Closes Flat Amid Commodity Strength
U.S.-India Trade Framework Signals Major Shift in Tariffs, Energy, and Supply Chains
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch
Prudential Financial Reports Higher Q4 Profit on Strong Underwriting and Investment Gains
American Airlines CEO to Meet Pilots Union Amid Storm Response and Financial Concerns
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says AI Investment Boom Is Just Beginning as NVDA Shares Surge
Trump Lifts 25% Tariff on Indian Goods in Strategic U.S.–India Trade and Energy Deal
Gold and Silver Prices Slide as Dollar Strength and Easing Tensions Weigh on Metals
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off
Samsung Electronics Shares Jump on HBM4 Mass Production Report 



