Harris Associates Open to Revised Paramount Skydance Bid for Warner Bros Discovery 
U.S. Lawmakers Urge Pentagon to Blacklist More Chinese Tech Firms Over Military Ties 
Nike Shares Slide as Margins Fall Again Amid China Slump and Costly Turnaround 
Volaris and Viva Agree to Merge, Creating Mexico’s Largest Low-Cost Airline Group 
Google and Apple Warn U.S. Visa Holders to Avoid International Travel Amid Lengthy Embassy Delays 
ANZ New CEO Forgoes Bonus After Shareholders Reject Executive Pay Report 
Bridgewater Associates Plans Major Employee Ownership Expansion in Milestone Year 
Citi Appoints Ryan Ellis as Head of Markets Sales for Australia and New Zealand 
Roche CEO Warns US Drug Price Deals Could Raise Costs of New Medicines in Switzerland 
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
Trump Signals Push for Lower Health Insurance Prices as ACA Premium Concerns Grow 
Dina Powell McCormick Resigns From Meta Board After Eight Months, May Take Advisory Role 
Elon Musk Wins Reinstatement of Historic Tesla Pay Package After Delaware Supreme Court Ruling 
Micron Technology Forecasts Surge in Revenue and Earnings on AI-Driven Memory Demand 
Instacart Stock Drops After FTC Probes AI-Based Price Discrimination Claims 
Oracle Stock Surges After Hours on TikTok Deal Optimism and OpenAI Fundraising Buzz 
Elliott Management Takes $1 Billion Stake in Lululemon, Pushes for Leadership Change 
Coach initiated legal action against Gap on Wednesday, alleging that the latter's Old Navy unit unlawfully sold T-shirts featuring the trademarked term "Coach." The luxury handbag manufacturer and its parent company, Tapestry, asserted that Gap had no authorization to market these T-shirts, leading to potential customer confusion.
Claims of Irreparable Harm by Coach
The Inquirer reported that the lawsuit in a Los Angeles federal court for trademark infringement highlighted the irreparable harm caused by Gap's unauthorized T-shirt sales. Coach emphasized that its trademarks epitomize a blend of fashion, craftsmanship, and luxury lifestyle items, distinct from the T-shirts in question. The legal dispute underscores Coach's commitment to protecting its brand identity, which was established in 1941.
Legal Actions and Damages Sought
According to Reuters, Coach, headquartered in New York, seeks unspecified damages from Gap in response to the Alleged Trademark Infringement. The legal claims encompass counterfeiting, violations of California's unfair competition law, and removing infringing inventory. Gap, headquartered in San Francisco, refrained from commenting on the ongoing litigation, a common practice for companies involved in legal disputes.
This legal confrontation exemplifies the efforts of luxury brands to combat the sale of counterfeit products, underscoring the significance of protecting intellectual property rights in the fashion industry.
Precedents in Fashion Law
This legal tangle between Coach and Gap is not an isolated incident in the fashion industry. Luxury brands have often gone to court to defend their trademarks and brand identities.
One notable example is the dispute between Gucci and Forever 21, where Gucci accused the retailer of copying its trademarked stripe design. These cases highlight the delicate balance brands must maintain between inspiring market trends and protecting their intellectual property.
They also showcase the critical role of legal frameworks in maintaining the integrity and exclusivity of luxury brand trademarks in a highly competitive market.
Photo: Simon Champagne/Unsplash
