Ukraine Sanctions Chief Heads to Washington to Push Russia Bill 
German Retail Sales Drop 3.4% in July 
MediaTek Shares Jump 10% on Nvidia’s $3.5 Billion Investment 
US Tech Giants’ AI Bond Boom Raises Euro Zone Borrowing Risks 
CIA-Linked Investor Helped Quantum Systems Expand in US 
Asian Stocks Tumble as Oil Surge Fuels Rate Hike Fears 
SpaceX Mobile Network Could Cost Up to $130 Billion, Bernstein Says 
How America courted increasingly destructive wildfires − and what that means for protecting homes today 
Asian Currencies Weaken as Dollar Rises, Kiwi Slides After RBNZ Hike 
GM Canada Workers Approve C$1.1 Billion Investment Deal 
We combed through old botanical surveys to track how plants on Australia’s islands are changing 
Asian Currencies Mixed as Yen Nears 160, Oil Surges 
Drug pollution in water is making salmon take more risks – new research 
Rise of the Zombie Bugs takes readers on a jaw-dropping tour of the parasite world 
Shein Shares Drop 5% After Weak Hong Kong IPO Debut 
BP Names Ian Tyler Permanent Chairman After Governance Shake-Up 
As the Black Summer megafires neared, people rallied to save wildlife and domestic animals. But it came at a real cost 
Add as a preferred source on Google
At the Reuters IMPACT conference, Puma's Head of Sustainability, Stefan Seidel, expressed reservations about the stringent requirements of the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set for full compliance by 2024.
Despite Puma's longstanding commitment to sustainability reporting, which spans two decades, Seidel believes the requirements outlined in the CSRD may be excessive. The company must comply with the directive by the 2024 financial year, ensuring that reports published in 2025 address environmental risks, establish quantitative targets, and undergo external auditing.
To gather relevant data for compliance, Puma collects information from its tier one and two suppliers, focusing on emissions, energy consumption, water usage, waste generation, and social aspects such as employee turnover and wages. The company has reduced emissions by 9% between 2017 and 2022 while doubling its business.
During the conference, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) expressed alignment between their respective reporting frameworks, reducing the potential for redundant reporting. Collaboration with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) aims to facilitate interoperability and minimize the need for duplicating information.
Marcel Haag, a senior official at the European Commission, emphasized that the new disclosure rules would aid companies in effectively communicating and managing their sustainability efforts. Richard Howitt, former CEO of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), acknowledged that initial compliance costs would necessitate system transformation.
However, the EU and ISSB have implemented additional phase-in periods to alleviate the burden on companies.
While concerns persist among companies regarding the mounting regulatory requirements, Eelco van der Enden, CEO of GRI, drew parallels to objections raised while implementing international accounting standards. He cautioned against overreaction, asserting compliance costs, competitive disadvantages, and business secrets are commonly invoked reasons to resist sustainability reporting.
Photo: The DK Photography/Unsplash
