At the Reuters IMPACT conference, Puma's Head of Sustainability, Stefan Seidel, expressed reservations about the stringent requirements of the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), set for full compliance by 2024.
Despite Puma's longstanding commitment to sustainability reporting, which spans two decades, Seidel believes the requirements outlined in the CSRD may be excessive. The company must comply with the directive by the 2024 financial year, ensuring that reports published in 2025 address environmental risks, establish quantitative targets, and undergo external auditing.
To gather relevant data for compliance, Puma collects information from its tier one and two suppliers, focusing on emissions, energy consumption, water usage, waste generation, and social aspects such as employee turnover and wages. The company has reduced emissions by 9% between 2017 and 2022 while doubling its business.
During the conference, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) expressed alignment between their respective reporting frameworks, reducing the potential for redundant reporting. Collaboration with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) aims to facilitate interoperability and minimize the need for duplicating information.
Marcel Haag, a senior official at the European Commission, emphasized that the new disclosure rules would aid companies in effectively communicating and managing their sustainability efforts. Richard Howitt, former CEO of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), acknowledged that initial compliance costs would necessitate system transformation.
However, the EU and ISSB have implemented additional phase-in periods to alleviate the burden on companies.
While concerns persist among companies regarding the mounting regulatory requirements, Eelco van der Enden, CEO of GRI, drew parallels to objections raised while implementing international accounting standards. He cautioned against overreaction, asserting compliance costs, competitive disadvantages, and business secrets are commonly invoked reasons to resist sustainability reporting.
Photo: The DK Photography/Unsplash


US Tech Giants’ AI Bond Boom Raises Euro Zone Borrowing Risks
Shein Shares Drop 5% After Weak Hong Kong IPO Debut
Thousands of satellites are due to burn up in the atmosphere every year – damaging the ozone layer and changing the climate
SpaceX Mobile Network Could Cost Up to $130 Billion, Bernstein Says
How is Antarctica melting, exactly? Crucial details are beginning to come into focus
Australia GDP Beats Forecast, Boosting RBA Rate Hike Bets
Parasites are ecological dark matter – and they need protecting
GM Canada Workers Approve C$1.1 Billion Investment Deal
China Services PMI Beats Forecasts as Domestic Demand Improves
German Retail Sales Drop 3.4% in July
Lynas Rare Earths Shares Rise After Takeover Talks Revealed
Oil Prices Rise as US-Iran Conflict Threatens Middle East Supply
South Korea Unveils Record $597 Billion 2027 Budget to Boost AI and Chips
Treasury Yields Set to Stay High as Debt Supply Pressures Bond Market
As the Black Summer megafires neared, people rallied to save wildlife and domestic animals. But it came at a real cost
Oil Prices Rise as U.S.-Iran Fighting Fuels Supply Fears 



