Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


Alaska Air Q3 Outlook Misses Estimates as Higher Fuel Costs Weigh on Profit Forecast
Morgan Stanley Downgrades Adobe, Workday as AI Transition Raises Growth Concerns
GE Vernova Q2 Revenue Tops Estimates as Earnings Miss, Shares Slide Despite Higher 2026 Outlook
Australia ASIC Tightens Auditor Oversight After KPMG Leak Scandal
Judge Approves Anthropic’s $1.5 Billion AI Copyright Settlement With Authors
Elon Musk Fuels SpaceX-Tesla Merger Speculation After Earnings Call
Intel, AMD Seek Long-Term China Server CPU Deals as AI Demand Drives Supply Crunch
Cathay Pacific Sees H1 Profit Surge on Strong Travel Demand
Scandinavian Tobacco Group Sells BREAK and Moro Brands to Japan Tobacco for €176 Million
Macquarie Names Greg Ward as CEO, Signaling Stability and Strategic Continuity
Trump Administration Monitors OpenAI Incident as Lawmakers Push AI Kill Switch Bill
OpenAI Australia Data Center Switches Cooling Strategy After Recycled Water Plan Fails
IBM Q2 Earnings Miss Estimates as Software Growth Offsets Infrastructure Weakness
Alphabet Q2 Earnings Beat Estimates as AI Spending, Google Cloud Growth Fuel Outlook
Super Micro Computer Stock Jumps 20% After Record AI Orders and Margin Surge
Nike Shifts China Online Sales Strategy to Boost Brand and Fight Local Rivals 



