Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


SanDisk Joins Nasdaq-100, Replacing Atlassian on April 20
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts
FedEx Pilots and Union Reach Tentative Agreement on 40% Pay Increase
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict
Rio Tinto's California Boron Assets Attract Over a Dozen Bidders, Valued at Up to $2 Billion
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave
MATCH Act: How New U.S. Chip Legislation Could Freeze China's Semiconductor Ambitions
Chinese Cars in Europe: Consumer Trust Is Shifting Fast
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Posts Strong Q3 Earnings, Announces AI-Driven Job Cuts
BHP's Incoming CEO Visits China Amid Pricing Dispute with CMRG
Foreign Investors Pour $18.65 Billion into Japanese Stocks Amid Market Stabilization
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs
Goldman Sachs, ANZ Cut Oil Forecasts Amid U.S.-Iran Ceasefire Hopes
Tokyo Electric Power Attracts Major Investors Amid Billion-Dollar Restructuring Push
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy 



