Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


Bank of America to Buy Up to 49.9% Stake in Jio Credit for $1.92 Billion
Austal Shares Surge 16% as Hanwha Offers Up to $1.2 Billion for U.S. Shipbuilding Business
CBA Posts Record A$10.98B Profit Despite Cautious Outlook
Lenovo Revenue Surges 43% as AI Demand Drives Record First-Quarter Growth
Airbus Joins Air India A320 Altitude Drop Probe
JPMorgan Plans More Asia-Pacific Hiring in 2027 as Corporate Banking Revenue Surges
US Judge Dismisses Gautam Adani Criminal Charges
SpaceX Shares Surge as Wall Street Backs AI Growth Potential
Google Pushes Gemini AI Overhaul as Sergey Brin Targets Model Supremacy
Ford to Move Some Lincoln Production From China to U.S. in 2030
Maersk Raises 2026 Earnings Outlook as Shipping Profits Beat Expectations
Sanrio Shares Plunge as Q1 Profit Miss Overshadows Strong Sales
Thyssenkrupp Raises 2026 Profit Outlook as Steel and Materials Units Strengthen
Antofagasta Shares Drop 5% as Miner Cuts 2026 Copper Production Forecast
Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Returns to Netflix With Major New Stake
OpenAI Executive Brad Lightcap to Leave for New AI Venture
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026 



