Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


Lazard Challenges Centerview for Role in Venezuela’s Massive Debt Restructuring
Australia’s Atlas Arteria Rejects IFM Global’s Increased A$7.4 Billion Takeover Offer
SpaceX IPO Sparks Market Optimism as Shares Surge 19% on Trading Debut
Changchun Targets EV Growth as China’s Auto Industry Consolidation Accelerates
DOJ Clears Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger Without Conditions
SpaceX IPO Set for Explosive Debut as Valuation Tops $2.2 Trillion
BHP Port Hedland Workers Back Strike Action Amid Pay Dispute
ByteDance Eyes Iluvatar, Baidu AI Chips Amid China’s AI Push
Anthropic Officials Meet White House Over AI Model Outage
AI Memory Boom Sparks Global Chip Supply Crunch
UK Banks Report Surge in APP Fraud Losses as Pressure Mounts on Meta and Tech Platforms
Roku Explores Sale Options as Interest Grows in Streaming and Ad Business
Elon Musk Becomes World's First Trillionaire After SpaceX IPO Surge
SK Hynix Stock Rebounds as AI Memory Chip Demand Fuels Expansion Plans
Wizz Air Beats Profit Forecast as Cost Controls Offset Industry Challenges
Woodside Energy Denies Exxon Mobil Takeover Talks Amid LNG Growth Focus 



