Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


Taiwan Issues Arrest Warrant for OnePlus CEO Over Alleged Illegal Recruitment Activities
U.S. Lawmakers Raise Alarm Over Trump Approval of Nvidia AI Chip Sales to China
Federal Judge Clears Way for Jury Trial in Elon Musk’s Fraud Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft
BYD Shares Rise in Hong Kong on Reports of Battery Supply Talks With Ford
TSMC Set to Post Record Q4 Profit as AI Chip Demand Accelerates
Google Seeks Delay on Data-Sharing Order as It Appeals Landmark Antitrust Ruling
China Halts Shipments of Nvidia H200 AI Chips, Forcing Suppliers to Pause Production
Chevron Set to Expand Venezuela Operations as U.S. Signals Shift on Oil Sanctions
China Considers New Rules to Limit Purchases of Foreign AI Chips Amid Growing Demand
Elon Musk Seeks $134 Billion in Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft Over Alleged Wrongful Gains
U.S. Transportation Board Sends Union Pacific–Norfolk Southern Merger Back for Revision
Boeing Reaches Tentative Settlement With Canadian Victim’s Family in 737 MAX Crash Lawsuits
Boeing Reaches Tentative Labor Deal With SPEEA Workers After Spirit AeroSystems Acquisition
Zhipu AI Launches GLM-Image Model Trained on Huawei Chips, Boosting China’s AI Self-Reliance Drive
Publishers Seek to Join Lawsuit Against Google Over Alleged AI Copyright Infringement
China’s AI Models Narrow the Gap With the West, Says Google DeepMind CEO 



