Emart, the South Korean grocery chain, has been slapped with a hefty fine for its unfair business system. It was revealed that the country’s antitrust regulator said on Sunday, March 14, that it has decided to penalize the super supermarket (SSM) division of Emart Inc. after concluding its investigation.
The case that led the regulators to fine Emart
Emart is the largest discount store chain in S. Korea, and it was checked by the regulators after receiving complaints. As per The Korea Herald, the company’s Emart Everyday store returned the seasonal products that it was not able to sell.
Based on the record of the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC), the suppliers said that goods such as ice boxes and sunscreen were purchased from them between January 2015 and January 2018. However, a total of 157,000 unsold ones were returned to 15 different suppliers which is an unreasonable thing to do.
The act is very unfair since Emart just passed the inventory costs of the unsold goods to the suppliers. The KFTC affirmed that this practice is a violation of the fair trade act on large retail businesses. This policy prohibits big retail companies from returning the purchased items without valid reasons.
And this is not all, as it was reported that Emart Everyday was also discovered to have other unjust business systems. The company has engaged in unlawful activities appertaining to its temporary workers and contracts with suppliers. Apart from the fine, the regulators ordered Emart to correct its wrongdoings that violated the republic’s Large-scale Distribution Business Act.
The FTC will monitor big retailers for the same offenses
As per Korea’s Aju News, the way Emart returned the goods clearly went against the government policy on large-scale businesses. What the company did placed a heavy burden on the suppliers since it will be them who will suffer from the losses.
Although there are instances when companies can return products from suppliers, this is only applicable to small businesses, and Emart is clearly not considered as a minor grocery store. Finally, to avoid similar cases and protect small-time suppliers, the Fair Trade Commission assured that it would continuously keep an eye on illegal business moves.
“We will continue to monitor large-scale retailers for unfair trade practices, such as improperly transferring costs to suppliers during the Corona 19 crisis,” the FTC stated.


GE Vernova and Hitachi's $40 Billion SMR Investment Signals a New Era for U.S. Nuclear Energy
Netflix Eyes South Korea for More Live Events as BTS Concert Livestream Approaches
Delivery Hero Sells Taiwan Foodpanda to Grab for $600 Million in Debt-Reduction Push
United Airlines Cuts Flights 5% Amid Soaring Fuel Costs From Iran War
Judge Dismisses Sam Altman Sexual Abuse Lawsuit, But Sister Can Refile
EA's $15B Debt Offering Draws $25B in Investor Demand Amid Credit Market Turmoil
Xiaomi Shares Drop After SU7 Launch as Margin Concerns Weigh on Investors
Jeff Bezos Eyes $100 Billion Fund to Transform Manufacturing With AI
U.S. Appeals Court Strikes Down FTC Order Against TurboTax "Free" Advertising
NVIDIA's Feynman AI Chip May Face Redesign Amid TSMC Capacity Crunch
J.P. Morgan Now Expects Two ECB Rate Hikes Amid Inflation Pressures
Amazon's "Transformer" Phone: Can It Succeed Where Fire Phone Failed?
Goldman Sachs Delays Bank of England Rate Cut Forecast Amid Middle East Inflation Risks
OpenAI's Desktop Superapp: Unifying ChatGPT, Codex, and Browser Tools for Enterprise AI
Tesla Eyes $2.9 Billion in Chinese Solar Equipment to Power 100 GW U.S. Manufacturing Push
FEMSA Cuts Jobs at Spin Fintech Unit, Refocuses Strategy on Oxxo Stores
Sinopec Posts 36.8% Net Profit Drop in 2025 Amid Weak Petrochemical Margins and Energy Transition Pressures 



