Weight-Loss Drug Ads Take Over the Super Bowl as Pharma Embraces Direct-to-Consumer Marketing 
Uber Ordered to Pay $8.5 Million in Bellwether Sexual Assault Lawsuit 
FDA Targets Hims & Hers Over $49 Weight-Loss Pill, Raising Legal and Safety Concerns 
Global PC Makers Eye Chinese Memory Chip Suppliers Amid Ongoing Supply Crunch 
TSMC Eyes 3nm Chip Production in Japan with $17 Billion Kumamoto Investment 
SoftBank Shares Slide After Arm Earnings Miss Fuels Tech Stock Sell-Off 
Toyota’s Surprise CEO Change Signals Strategic Shift Amid Global Auto Turmoil 
Sony Q3 Profit Jumps on Gaming and Image Sensors, Full-Year Outlook Raised 
Trump Backs Nexstar–Tegna Merger Amid Shifting U.S. Media Landscape 
CK Hutchison Launches Arbitration After Panama Court Revokes Canal Port Licences 
Amazon Stock Rebounds After Earnings as $200B Capex Plan Sparks AI Spending Debate 
OpenAI Expands Enterprise AI Strategy With Major Hiring Push Ahead of New Business Offering 
Instagram Outage Disrupts Thousands of U.S. Users 
Washington Post Publisher Will Lewis Steps Down After Layoffs 
Nasdaq Proposes Fast-Track Rule to Accelerate Index Inclusion for Major New Listings 
Once Upon a Farm Raises Nearly $198 Million in IPO, Valued at Over $724 Million 
Australian lender ANZ Group is facing mounting pressure as a second influential proxy advisor has urged shareholders to vote against its executive remuneration report ahead of the bank’s annual meeting on December 18. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a key global proxy advisory firm, released a report on Thursday recommending that investors reject the bank’s executive pay proposal. Earlier in the week, CGI Glass Lewis issued a similar recommendation, deepening scrutiny over ANZ’s handling of executive compensation.
The backlash follows ANZ’s decision this year to strip former Chief Executive Shayne Elliott of A$13.5 million (US$8.9 million) in bonuses tied to his long-term compensation package. Several other former executives also saw their pay reduced, resulting in a total of about A$32 million in eliminated bonuses, according to the bank’s annual report. Despite these cuts, ISS argued that the penalties were not stringent enough given ANZ’s recent history of scandals. The firm noted that Elliott still retained approximately A$7.9 million in long-term incentive payments, raising concerns about the accountability and governance standards within the bank’s leadership.
Proxy advisors hold significant sway in Australia, where many major institutional investors rely on their recommendations when casting votes at corporate meetings. A second consecutive vote against ANZ’s remuneration report could trigger a “second strike,” giving shareholders the opportunity to call for a board spill and potentially vote on whether directors should be removed. Both ISS and CGI Glass Lewis, however, stopped short of recommending a full board spill.
The heightened scrutiny comes after ANZ agreed in September to pay A$240 million in penalties—its largest ever—following findings by Australia’s corporate regulator. The regulator cited systemic failures, including acting “unconscionably” in a government bond deal and charging fees to deceased customers. The combination of reputational damage and governance concerns has intensified investor focus on the bank’s executive accountability as ANZ seeks to restore trust and stability.
