OpenAI Restricts Astra AI Over Cyberattack Risks 
Sinopec Boosts Russian ESPO Oil Purchases as Middle East Supply Tightens 
Alibaba Plans Revenue-Sharing Model for Qwen3.8-Max AI Commercial Users 
Alphabet Stock Slides as Google AI Pioneer Jeff Dean Exits to Launch Discovery Loop 
ADNOC Gas Targets Up to $4B Profit in 2026 
Mercedes-Benz Stock Offers Deep-Value Potential as Citi Sees Recovery Catalysts 
Cloudflare Stock Jumps 15% as Earnings Beat Estimates, 2026 Outlook Raised 
UOB Q2 Net Profit Rises 10% as Wealth Management Growth Boosts Earnings 
SK Hynix, Samsung Lead Asian Chip Stock Selloff After Sandisk, Western Digital Outlook 
Daimler Truck Q2 Profit Falls 18%, 2026 Outlook Raised 
Delta Flight Makes Emergency Landing in Atlanta After Cockpit Fumes Reported 
Deutsche Bank Upgrades Persimmon to Buy After Strong First-Half Results 
DeepSeek to Raise AI API Prices as Demand for New Models Surges 
SanDisk Q4 Earnings Beat Estimates as Q1 Revenue Outlook Meets Expectations 
Shein Scales Back Vietnam Operations as US Trade Rules Shift 
Airbnb Stock Jumps After Q2 Earnings Beat, Strong 2026 Outlook 
AMP Shares Surge 13% After Strong Profit and A$150 Million Buyback 
Australian lender ANZ Group is facing mounting pressure as a second influential proxy advisor has urged shareholders to vote against its executive remuneration report ahead of the bank’s annual meeting on December 18. Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a key global proxy advisory firm, released a report on Thursday recommending that investors reject the bank’s executive pay proposal. Earlier in the week, CGI Glass Lewis issued a similar recommendation, deepening scrutiny over ANZ’s handling of executive compensation.
The backlash follows ANZ’s decision this year to strip former Chief Executive Shayne Elliott of A$13.5 million (US$8.9 million) in bonuses tied to his long-term compensation package. Several other former executives also saw their pay reduced, resulting in a total of about A$32 million in eliminated bonuses, according to the bank’s annual report. Despite these cuts, ISS argued that the penalties were not stringent enough given ANZ’s recent history of scandals. The firm noted that Elliott still retained approximately A$7.9 million in long-term incentive payments, raising concerns about the accountability and governance standards within the bank’s leadership.
Proxy advisors hold significant sway in Australia, where many major institutional investors rely on their recommendations when casting votes at corporate meetings. A second consecutive vote against ANZ’s remuneration report could trigger a “second strike,” giving shareholders the opportunity to call for a board spill and potentially vote on whether directors should be removed. Both ISS and CGI Glass Lewis, however, stopped short of recommending a full board spill.
The heightened scrutiny comes after ANZ agreed in September to pay A$240 million in penalties—its largest ever—following findings by Australia’s corporate regulator. The regulator cited systemic failures, including acting “unconscionably” in a government bond deal and charging fees to deceased customers. The combination of reputational damage and governance concerns has intensified investor focus on the bank’s executive accountability as ANZ seeks to restore trust and stability.
