Epstein Files: Key Figures Named in DOJ Document Release 
U.S. Raises Alarm Over Chinese AI Firms’ Alleged IP Theft Through Model Distillation 
Sam Altman Moves to Dismiss Punitive Damages in Sister's Sexual Abuse Lawsuit 
Chinese Chip Stocks Surge on AI Boom and Domestic Tech Push 
Taiwan Court Fines Tokyo Electron Unit $4.78M in Major TSMC Trade Secrets Case 
U.S. Sanctions Target Chinese Refinery Over Iranian Oil Purchases 
SMC Corp Stock Surges as Palliser Capital Pushes for Major Share Buyback 
Novartis Q1 2026 Earnings Miss Expectations as Generic Competition Pressures Sales 
Toyota Global Vehicle Sales Decline in March Amid RAV4 Transition and Middle East Slowdown 
U.S. Warns Allies Over Alleged Chinese AI IP Theft Linked to DeepSeek 
DeepSeek Slashes AI Model Pricing to Boost Adoption and Challenge Global Rivals 
$16B Michigan Data Center Project Boosts U.S. AI Infrastructure Expansion 
Lightelligence IPO Soars Over 400% in Hong Kong Debut Amid Rising AI Investment Demand 
SpaceX Eyes $60B Cursor Deal to Boost AI Power Ahead of IPO 
Kia Cuts EV Prices in Europe as Chinese Carmakers Intensify Competition 
Trump Administration Files Fraud Charges Against Southern Poverty Law Center Over Informant Payments 
U.S. Budget Airlines Seek $2.5 Billion Government Aid Amid Rising Jet Fuel Costs 
A federal judge in Oakland, California, has rejected renewed attempts by OpenAI and Microsoft to dismiss a high-profile lawsuit filed by Elon Musk, allowing the case to proceed to a jury trial starting April 27. The ruling marks a significant development in an ongoing legal battle that highlights growing tensions around artificial intelligence governance, commercialization, and corporate influence.
The lawsuit, brought by Musk, accuses OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman, and key partners of fraud and misrepresentation. Musk, who co-founded OpenAI in 2015, claims he was misled about the organization’s long-term mission. According to the complaint, OpenAI originally positioned itself as a nonprofit entity focused on developing artificial intelligence for the public good. Musk alleges that the company later abandoned this nonprofit public-benefit purpose and transitioned into a for-profit structure that is closely aligned with Microsoft Corporation, which has invested billions of dollars into OpenAI and integrated its technology into commercial products.
OpenAI and Microsoft argued that Musk’s claims were legally insufficient and lacked factual support, urging the court to dismiss the case. However, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that there are enough disputed facts to warrant a jury’s consideration. Her decision clears the way for a full trial, signaling that the court believes the allegations deserve closer scrutiny rather than early dismissal.
In response, OpenAI has strongly denied the allegations, describing the lawsuit as baseless and characterizing it as part of a broader pattern of harassment by a competitor. The company has stated it will vigorously defend its evolution, governance structure, and strategic partnership with Microsoft, emphasizing that its mission has adapted alongside rapid advances in artificial intelligence technology.
Musk, who has since launched rival AI company xAI, is seeking unspecified damages. The trial is expected to run through May 22, potentially lasting up to four weeks, according to court filings. Beyond its legal implications, the case underscores broader industry debates about transparency, ethical AI development, and the balance between nonprofit ideals and commercial realities in the fast-growing artificial intelligence sector.
