Trump Administration to Secure Equity Stake in Pat Gelsinger’s XLight Startup 
Morgan Stanley Boosts Nvidia and Broadcom Targets as AI Demand Surges 
Wikipedia Pushes for AI Licensing Deals as Jimmy Wales Calls for Fair Compensation 
Intel Boosts Malaysia Operations with Additional RM860 Million Investment 
Microchip Technology Boosts Q3 Outlook on Strong Bookings Momentum 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
Norway’s Wealth Fund Backs Shareholder Push for Microsoft Human-Rights Risk Report 
Senate Sets December 8 Vote on Trump’s NASA Nominee Jared Isaacman 
EU Prepares Antitrust Probe Into Meta’s AI Integration on WhatsApp 
Australia Releases New National AI Plan, Opts for Existing Laws to Manage Risks 
OpenAI Moves to Acquire Neptune as It Expands AI Training Capabilities 
Apple Alerts EU Regulators That Apple Ads and Maps Meet DMA Gatekeeper Thresholds 
Banks Consider $38 Billion Funding Boost for Oracle, Vantage, and OpenAI Expansion 
Samsung Launches Galaxy Z TriFold to Elevate Its Position in the Foldable Smartphone Market 
Amazon and Google Launch New Multicloud Networking Service to Boost High-Speed Cloud Connectivity 
Nexperia Urges China Division to Resume Chip Production as Supply Risks Mount 
Coupang Apologizes After Massive Data Breach Affecting 33.7 Million Users 
The progressive members of the Democratic party, as well as a considerable number of American workers, have been pushing for the increase in the minimum wage in every state for almost a decade now. However, while doing so could result in workers getting a living wage, a new government study reveals that it could also result in more job loss due to automation.
The study in question was done by researchers at the US National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and it is titled “People Versus Machines: The Impact of Minimum Wages on Automatable Jobs”. According to the data that the researchers gathered, which included employment numbers from the 80s until 2015, a direct correlation was found between minimum wage increases and replacement by machines.
“Based on CPS data from 1980-2015, we find that increasing the minimum wage decreases significantly the share of automatable employment held by low-skilled workers, and increases the likelihood that low-skilled workers in automatable jobs become unemployed,” the paper reads. “The average effects mask significant heterogeneity by industry and demographic group, including substantive adverse effects for older, low-skilled workers in manufacturing. The findings imply that groups often ignored in the minimum wage literature are in fact quite vulnerable to employment changes and job loss because of automation following a minimum wage increase.”
The main people behind the study are London School of Economics’ Grace Lordan and University of California, Irvine’s David Neumark. Their conclusion is that “low-skilled” workers are at risk of losing their livelihood with a wage increase simply because their jobs could be replaced by automation.
This makes a lot of sense when seen from an employer’s point of view. After all, as Futurism points out, if it costs more to keep human workers than to simply have machines do the job, companies will choose the cheaper option every time. What’s more, machines have huge advantages over human workers in the form of unlimited work time, no vacation or sick days, and no unions.
