Japan, U.S. Discuss $19 Billion GlobalFoundries Chip Plant 
Qualcomm Gains on $60B Amazon AI Chip Deal 
US Federal Register Drops Alibaba Qwen AI Search Tool 
Europe can’t achieve space sovereignty alone. Here’s why 
SoftBank Shares Jump 8% as SB Energy IPO Optimism Builds 
Databricks to Invest $350 Million in Singapore AI Expansion 
AI is supercharging money scams – here’s what you can do to protect yourself 
China’s robots can run faster than Usain Bolt – now they are being prepared for war 
Unsustainable – or manageable? We don’t yet know how data centres will impact Australia’s environment 
France Urges Faster AI Push Despite Safety Risks 
Guterres Urges Stronger Global AI Safeguards Ahead of UN Assembly 
Hyundai CEO Warns Chinese Automakers Could Disrupt US Market 
SpaceX Nasdaq 100 Weight to More Than Double in Rebalance 
Trump Rejects Calls for Tougher AI Regulation 
NASA, Boeing Discuss Expanding Starliner Missions 
Meta CEO Zuckerberg Backs Independent AI Safety Reviews Over Development Slowdown 
Who should own the knowledge that underpins AI technology? 
Add as a preferred source on Google
The progressive members of the Democratic party, as well as a considerable number of American workers, have been pushing for the increase in the minimum wage in every state for almost a decade now. However, while doing so could result in workers getting a living wage, a new government study reveals that it could also result in more job loss due to automation.
The study in question was done by researchers at the US National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and it is titled “People Versus Machines: The Impact of Minimum Wages on Automatable Jobs”. According to the data that the researchers gathered, which included employment numbers from the 80s until 2015, a direct correlation was found between minimum wage increases and replacement by machines.
“Based on CPS data from 1980-2015, we find that increasing the minimum wage decreases significantly the share of automatable employment held by low-skilled workers, and increases the likelihood that low-skilled workers in automatable jobs become unemployed,” the paper reads. “The average effects mask significant heterogeneity by industry and demographic group, including substantive adverse effects for older, low-skilled workers in manufacturing. The findings imply that groups often ignored in the minimum wage literature are in fact quite vulnerable to employment changes and job loss because of automation following a minimum wage increase.”
The main people behind the study are London School of Economics’ Grace Lordan and University of California, Irvine’s David Neumark. Their conclusion is that “low-skilled” workers are at risk of losing their livelihood with a wage increase simply because their jobs could be replaced by automation.
This makes a lot of sense when seen from an employer’s point of view. After all, as Futurism points out, if it costs more to keep human workers than to simply have machines do the job, companies will choose the cheaper option every time. What’s more, machines have huge advantages over human workers in the form of unlimited work time, no vacation or sick days, and no unions.
