Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


U.S. Arrests Soleimani's Relatives After Green Cards Revoked
DOJ Antitrust Chief Rejects Political Fast-Track for Paramount-Skydance Deal
Trump Issues Deadline for Iran to Reopen Strait of Hormuz Amid Escalating Conflict
Trump-Xi Summit 2026: U.S.-China Trade War Tensions and Tariff Talks
Iran Tightens Grip on Strait of Hormuz as Israel Prepares Strikes and Oil Markets Spiral
Judge Blocks DOJ Subpoenas in Federal Reserve Investigation, Delaying Powell Succession
Federal Reserve Hires Robert Hur to Fight DOJ Subpoenas Targeting Jerome Powell
Trump Administration Settles Lawsuit Barring Federal Agencies from Pressuring Social Media Censorship
Will a new border deal with the US open a backdoor into Kiwis’ personal data?
Maduro Faces Rare Narcoterrorism Charges in U.S. Court
Stellantis Shareholder Fraud Lawsuit Dismissed by U.S. Judge
Unilever and Magnum Face Defamation Lawsuit Over Ben & Jerry's Board Chair Dismissal
Federal Judge Rules CBP Violated Warrantless Arrest Order During Sacramento Immigration Sweep
Taiwan Opposition Leader's China Visit: A Peace Mission Amid Rising Tensions
Brazil's Top Court Blocks Trump Official's Visit to Imprisoned Bolsonaro
Palestinian Activist Leqaa Kordia Released from U.S. Immigration Detention After Judge's Order 



