Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


Peter Mandelson Arrested in London Amid Jeffrey Epstein Ties Investigation
Costco Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Tariff Refunds as Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump's IEEPA Tariffs
ICE Arrests Colombian Journalist in Tennessee, Trump Administration Says She Will Receive Due Process
Supreme Court Backs GOP Lawmaker in New York Redistricting Fight Ahead of Midterms
California Seeks Court Order to Halt Amazon’s Alleged Price Inflation Practices
Does international law still matter? The strike on the girls’ school in Iran shows why we need it
Iran's Government Remains Stable Despite U.S. and Israeli Strikes, Intelligence Shows
California Court Rejects xAI Bid to Block AI Data Transparency Law
Estée Lauder Sues Jo Malone Over Trademark Dispute Involving Zara
Federal Judge Blocks Virginia Social Media Age Verification Law Over First Amendment Concerns
Anthropic Sues Pentagon Over AI Blacklist, Citing Free Speech Violations
IEA Releases Record 400 Million Barrels of Oil Amid U.S.-Iran War
Microsoft Backs Anthropic in Legal Fight Against Pentagon's AI Blacklist
U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs, Deepening Global Trade Uncertainty
U.S. Blocks Venezuela From Funding Nicolas Maduro’s Legal Defense in New York Drug Trafficking Case
U.S. Calls for Reassessment of International Aid to Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan 



