Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


U.S. Initiates $11.1 Billion Arms Sale to Taiwan Amid Rising China Tensions
Union-Aligned Investors Question Amazon, Walmart and Alphabet on Trump Immigration Policies
Trump Administration Moves to Keep TransAlta Coal Plant Running Amid Rising AI Power Demand
UN Warns Gaza Humanitarian Aid at Risk as Israel Registration Rules Threaten NGO Operations
Trump Administration Plans Major Increase in Denaturalization Cases for Naturalized U.S. Citizens
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial
Venezuela Seeks UN Security Council Meeting Over U.S. Oil Tanker Blockade
Dan Bongino to Step Down as FBI Deputy Director After Brief, Controversial Tenure
Apple App Store Injunction Largely Upheld as Appeals Court Rules on Epic Games Case
Judge Orders Return of Seized Evidence in Comey-Related Case, DOJ May Seek New Warrant
Jared Isaacman Confirmed as NASA Administrator, Becomes 15th Leader of U.S. Space Agency
U.S. Pressures ICC to Limit Authority as Washington Threatens New Sanctions
Brazil Arrests Former Peruvian Foreign Minister Augusto Blacker Miller in International Fraud Case
Federal Appeals Court Allows Trump’s National Guard Deployment in Washington, D.C. to Continue
Sydney Bondi Beach Terror Attack Kills 16, Sparks Gun Law and Security Debate
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders
Tunisia Protests Grow as Opposition Unites Against President Kais Saied’s Rule 



