Italy’s Supreme Court has definitively upheld the acquittal of Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini in a high-profile migrant kidnapping case, bringing an end to years of legal proceedings and eliminating the possibility of further appeals. The ruling confirms a previous verdict issued by a Palermo court in Sicily, which last year cleared Salvini of charges linked to his actions as interior minister in 2019.
At the center of the case was Salvini’s decision to block a ship operated by Spanish humanitarian group Open Arms from docking at an Italian port. The vessel was carrying more than 100 migrants and remained at sea for nearly three weeks while Italian authorities refused entry. Prosecutors argued that the decision constituted kidnapping and abuse of power, seeking a prison sentence of up to six years. However, the trial court ruled that Salvini acted within his institutional role, a conclusion now fully endorsed by Italy’s highest court.
Reacting to the Supreme Court decision, Salvini stated on social media that “defending borders is not a crime,” framing the verdict as a validation of his long-standing hardline immigration policies. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose governing coalition includes Salvini’s far-right League party, echoed that sentiment, describing the ruling as confirmation that safeguarding Italy’s borders is a legitimate duty of government officials.
The case drew international attention as a symbol of Europe’s broader debate over migration control, humanitarian obligations, and national sovereignty. Critics, including Open Arms founder Oscar Camps, condemned the verdict, calling it a political decision that fosters impunity and undermines justice for migrants. Camps argued that the ruling failed to protect vulnerable people stranded at sea.
In a rare procedural move, Palermo prosecutors attempted to overturn the acquittal by appealing directly to the Supreme Court, bypassing the intermediate appeals court. They maintained that Salvini’s conduct was undisputed and requested legal clarification on whether it amounted to a criminal offense. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, concluding that the appeal lacked merit.
Salvini’s lawyer, Giulia Bongiorno, welcomed the outcome, stating that the ruling confirmed both the legality of Salvini’s actions and that the trial itself should never have been initiated. The decision reinforces Salvini’s political standing and closes one of Italy’s most controversial legal battles over migration policy.


US Appeals Court Keeps Trump’s 10% Global Tariff in Effect During Ongoing Legal Battle
Trump Lawyers Face Scrutiny After Missing Deadline in $10 Billion BBC Defamation Lawsuit
UN Clash Erupts as Israel Envoy Confronts UN Officials Over Blacklisting Reports
Marco Rubio to Visit Gulf Nations for Key Middle East Talks
U.S. Supreme Court to Review Trump Administration Appeal on Immigrant Detention Without Bond Hearings
Russia and Ukraine Exchange Strikes After Zelenskiy-Trump Talks
Canada, British Columbia Launch $5 Billion Infrastructure Partnership to Boost Housing, Transit, and Healthcare
Meloni Slams Trump Over G7 Photo Claim as U.S.-Italy Relations Deteriorate
DOJ Opens Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll Over Alleged Perjury
South Korea Ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol Sentenced to 30 Years Over Martial Law Plot
IRGC Expands Secret Iraq Cells to Target Gulf States Hosting U.S. Forces
Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Renovation Faces Scrutiny After Paint Peels
Trump Administration Defends Anthropic AI Restrictions in Ongoing Federal Lawsuit
Pakistan, Qatar Mediation Secures Preliminary U.S.-Iran Deal Amid High-Stakes Negotiations
Trump Team Rejects BBC Financial Data Request in $10B Lawsuit
Meta Seeks Legal Shield From Child-Harm Lawsuits Amid KOSA Talks 



