Vice President Kamala Harris has declared her intention to appear at the second presidential debate in September, regardless of whether former President Donald Trump decides to participate. This declaration follows Trump’s refusal to commit to the discussion, casting uncertainty over the event.
Michael Tyler, Harris's campaign communications director, emphasized that Harris believes the American people deserve to hear directly from the candidates vying for the highest office. He criticized Team Trump for their hesitancy, suggesting it was a convenient yet expected backtrack. Harris is determined to take the stage on September 10th at the ABC debate, leaving the possibility open that she might end up debating an empty podium if Trump fails to appear.
This tactic is reminiscent of Jon Ossoff’s successful strategy during the 2020 Senate race in Georgia, where he debated an empty podium after then-Senator David Perdue declined to participate. Ossoff's move highlighted his opponent's absence and played a significant role in his eventual victory alongside Rev. Raphael Warnock, which gave Democrats control of the Senate for the first time in six years.
Ossoff reacted to the news by posting a picture of his debate with Perdue’s empty podium, captioned "SMART MOVE," further reinforcing the potential effectiveness of Harris's strategy.
The debate scheduling has been contentious from the start. President Joe Biden initially agreed to two debates with Trump, one in June and one in August. However, Biden's lackluster performance in the June debate, which took place in Atlanta, raised serious concerns about his campaign viability. His low energy and confused demeanor led to growing pressure within his party, ultimately resulting in Biden withdrawing from the race and endorsing Harris.
In the wake of Biden's exit, the Trump campaign has shown reluctance to commit to the September debate. They have issued statements suggesting that it would be inappropriate to finalize plans with Harris due to the possibility of further changes in the Democratic nomination. Trump strategist Jason Miller echoed this sentiment on MSNBC, stating that while the debate is expected to proceed, the campaign prefers to wait until Harris is formally nominated before making any commitments.
The political implications of this scenario are significant. Harris’s willingness to debate, even if it means facing an empty podium, portrays her as committed and undeterred by Trump’s maneuvering. On the other hand, Trump’s hesitation could be perceived as a lack of readiness to engage directly with his opponent, potentially affecting his standing among undecided voters.
As the political landscape shifts, all eyes will be on the developments leading up to the September debate. Whether or not Trump decides to participate, Harris's strategy positions her as a determined candidate ready to confront challenges head-on, echoing the successful tactics of past political campaigns.