Winter Storm Triggers Widespread Flight Cancellations Across U.S. as Airlines Urge Travelers to Rebook 
Why a ‘rip-off’ degree might be worth the money after all – research study 
U.S. and Rwanda Sign $228 Million Health Partnership to Boost Self-Reliance 
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly Cut Obesity Drug Prices in China as Competition Intensifies 
Supreme Court Signals Skepticism Toward Hawaii Handgun Carry Law 
Stuck in a creativity slump at work? Here are some surprising ways to get your spark back 
Amazon Reviews Supplier Costs as U.S.–China Tariffs Ease 
Apple China Holiday Sale Offers Discounts Up to 1,000 Yuan on Popular Devices 
Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly Cut Obesity Drug Prices in China, Boosting Access to Wegovy and Mounjaro 
Merck Raises Growth Outlook, Targets $70 Billion Revenue From New Drugs by Mid-2030s 
Canada’s local food system faces major roadblocks without urgent policy changes 
Can your cat recognise you by scent? New study shows it’s likely 
What’s the difference between baking powder and baking soda? It’s subtle, but significant 
Sanofi to Acquire Dynavax in $2.2 Billion Deal to Strengthen Vaccines Portfolio 
FDA Fast-Track Drug Reviews Delayed Over Safety and Efficacy Concerns 
Bayer’s Stroke Drug Achieves Breakthrough Trial Results, Boosting Market Confidence 
Supreme Court Signals Doubts Over Trump’s Bid to Fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook 
Coca-Cola faces lawsuit over "good for you" Minute Maid juice claims. U.S. District Judge questions health implications while FDA lacks sugar intake guidelines. The outcome could reshape industry advertising standards.
Reynolds, who says fruit juices increase the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes, argues that Coca-Cola exploits and perpetuates the misperception that juice is healthy by marketing and labeling its Minute Maid juice boxes as being "Good for You!" and "Part of a Healthy, Balanced Diet." The company sought to dismiss the claims in a recent hearing.
During the hearing, Steven Zalesin, an attorney representing Coca-Cola, pointed out that the "good for you" claims on the juice boxes were part of implied and explicit nutrient claims allowed under FDA rules. Zalesin claimed that the messaging was not misleading as the packaging explicitly mentions zero added sugar and the presence of vitamin C, with accompanying information on its health benefits.
However, U.S. District Judge Vincent Chhabria appeared skeptical of Coca-Cola's arguments, suggesting that the messaging on the packaging implies that the juice actively contributes to a healthy diet. Zalesin countered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture's position that 100% fruit juice without added sugars can be part of a healthy dietary pattern.
Chhabria raised concerns that consumers might interpret the pictures of fruit on the juice box as indicating that drinking the juice is as healthy as eating fruit. Paul Joseph, counsel to the plaintiff, argued that using the word "healthy" to advertise a product should be subject to higher standards.
The lawsuit raises important questions about the health claims made by food and beverage manufacturers. The FDA's absence of guidelines on "maximum or correct" daily sugar intake complicates the case. The final decision will shape how companies can market and advertise their products based on nutrient content claims.
As the legal battle continues, consumers remain wary of such claims and the overall impact on their health. With increasing awareness of the potential risks associated with consuming fruit juice, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for the industry.
Photo: himanshu Chaudhary/Unsplash
