U.S. Experts to Reassess Newborn Hepatitis B Vaccination Guidelines Amid Growing Debate 
Why financial hardship is more likely if you’re disabled or sick 
Locked up then locked out: how NZ’s bank rules make life for ex-prisoners even harder 
Tunisian Opposition Figure Chaima Issa Arrested Amid Rising Crackdown 
Netanyahu Requests Presidential Pardon Amid Ongoing Corruption Trial 
FDA Names Tracy Beth Høeg as Acting CDER Director After Richard Pazdur Announces Retirement 
YouTube Agrees to Follow Australia’s New Under-16 Social Media Ban 
Trump and Merck KGaA Partner to Slash IVF Drug Costs and Expand Fertility Coverage 
IKEA Expands U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Tariffs and Supply Chain Strategy Shift 
Trump Vows Pardon for Former Honduran President as Honduras Faces Tight Election 
Eli Lilly’s Weight-Loss Pill Nears Fast-Track FDA Approval as Profits Surge on Global Demand 
Union Urges Court to Compel Trump Administration to Restore CFPB Funding 
Bolsonaro Blames Medication Mix-Up for Ankle Monitor Tampering as Detention Continues 
Youth are charting new freshwater futures by learning from the water on the water 
Tesla Faces 19% Drop in UK Registrations as Competition Intensifies 
Visa to Move European Headquarters to London’s Canary Wharf 
Coca-Cola faces lawsuit over "good for you" Minute Maid juice claims. U.S. District Judge questions health implications while FDA lacks sugar intake guidelines. The outcome could reshape industry advertising standards.
Reynolds, who says fruit juices increase the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes, argues that Coca-Cola exploits and perpetuates the misperception that juice is healthy by marketing and labeling its Minute Maid juice boxes as being "Good for You!" and "Part of a Healthy, Balanced Diet." The company sought to dismiss the claims in a recent hearing.
During the hearing, Steven Zalesin, an attorney representing Coca-Cola, pointed out that the "good for you" claims on the juice boxes were part of implied and explicit nutrient claims allowed under FDA rules. Zalesin claimed that the messaging was not misleading as the packaging explicitly mentions zero added sugar and the presence of vitamin C, with accompanying information on its health benefits.
However, U.S. District Judge Vincent Chhabria appeared skeptical of Coca-Cola's arguments, suggesting that the messaging on the packaging implies that the juice actively contributes to a healthy diet. Zalesin countered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture's position that 100% fruit juice without added sugars can be part of a healthy dietary pattern.
Chhabria raised concerns that consumers might interpret the pictures of fruit on the juice box as indicating that drinking the juice is as healthy as eating fruit. Paul Joseph, counsel to the plaintiff, argued that using the word "healthy" to advertise a product should be subject to higher standards.
The lawsuit raises important questions about the health claims made by food and beverage manufacturers. The FDA's absence of guidelines on "maximum or correct" daily sugar intake complicates the case. The final decision will shape how companies can market and advertise their products based on nutrient content claims.
As the legal battle continues, consumers remain wary of such claims and the overall impact on their health. With increasing awareness of the potential risks associated with consuming fruit juice, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for the industry.
Photo: himanshu Chaudhary/Unsplash
