AI is driving down the price of knowledge – universities have to rethink what they offer 
U.S. Reveals 2026 Medicare Star Ratings: Aetna, UnitedHealth Lead in Quality Scores 
Canada Loses Measles-Free Status After Nearly 30 Years Amid Declining Vaccination Rates 
Supporters Gather Ahead of Verdict in Jimmy Lai’s Landmark Hong Kong National Security Trial 
FDA Says No Black Box Warning Planned for COVID-19 Vaccines Despite Safety Debate 
Azul Airlines Wins Court Approval for $2 Billion Debt Restructuring and New Capital Raise 
Blackstone Leads $400 Million Funding Round in Cyera at $9 Billion Valuation 
EU Court Cuts Intel Antitrust Fine to €237 Million Amid Long-Running AMD Dispute 
U.S. Experts to Reassess Newborn Hepatitis B Vaccination Guidelines Amid Growing Debate 
Bolivia’s Ex-President Luis Arce Detained in Embezzlement Probe 
Amazon in Talks to Invest $10 Billion in OpenAI as AI Firm Eyes $1 Trillion IPO Valuation 
Trump Administration Reviews Nvidia H200 Chip Sales to China, Marking Major Shift in U.S. AI Export Policy 
Parents abused by their children often suffer in silence – specialist therapy is helping them find a voice 
The ghost of Robodebt – Federal Court rules billions of dollars in welfare debts must be recalculated 
Eli Lilly’s Inluriyo Gains FDA Approval for Advanced Breast Cancer Treatment 
Colombia’s Clan del Golfo Peace Talks Signal Mandatory Prison Sentences for Top Leaders 
Oracle Stock Slides After Blue Owl Exit Report, Company Says Michigan Data Center Talks Remain on Track 
Coca-Cola faces lawsuit over "good for you" Minute Maid juice claims. U.S. District Judge questions health implications while FDA lacks sugar intake guidelines. The outcome could reshape industry advertising standards.
Reynolds, who says fruit juices increase the risk of heart disease and type 2 diabetes, argues that Coca-Cola exploits and perpetuates the misperception that juice is healthy by marketing and labeling its Minute Maid juice boxes as being "Good for You!" and "Part of a Healthy, Balanced Diet." The company sought to dismiss the claims in a recent hearing.
During the hearing, Steven Zalesin, an attorney representing Coca-Cola, pointed out that the "good for you" claims on the juice boxes were part of implied and explicit nutrient claims allowed under FDA rules. Zalesin claimed that the messaging was not misleading as the packaging explicitly mentions zero added sugar and the presence of vitamin C, with accompanying information on its health benefits.
However, U.S. District Judge Vincent Chhabria appeared skeptical of Coca-Cola's arguments, suggesting that the messaging on the packaging implies that the juice actively contributes to a healthy diet. Zalesin countered with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture's position that 100% fruit juice without added sugars can be part of a healthy dietary pattern.
Chhabria raised concerns that consumers might interpret the pictures of fruit on the juice box as indicating that drinking the juice is as healthy as eating fruit. Paul Joseph, counsel to the plaintiff, argued that using the word "healthy" to advertise a product should be subject to higher standards.
The lawsuit raises important questions about the health claims made by food and beverage manufacturers. The FDA's absence of guidelines on "maximum or correct" daily sugar intake complicates the case. The final decision will shape how companies can market and advertise their products based on nutrient content claims.
As the legal battle continues, consumers remain wary of such claims and the overall impact on their health. With increasing awareness of the potential risks associated with consuming fruit juice, the outcome of this case could have significant implications for the industry.
Photo: himanshu Chaudhary/Unsplash
