LG Electronics Posts Record Q1 Revenue Amid Strong Demand and Cost Improvements 
Disney Plans to Cut 1,000 Jobs Amid Ongoing Restructuring Efforts 
Bank of America Identifies Top Asia-Pacific Semiconductor Stocks Poised for AI-Driven Growth 
Alibaba Shares Slide as Jefferies Slashes Price Target Over AI Spending and Business Losses 
China's AI Stocks Surge as Zhipu and MiniMax Hit Record Highs 
TSMC Posts Strong Q1 2025 Revenue, Riding AI Chip Demand Wave 
Deere & Company Agrees to $99 Million Settlement Over Right-to-Repair Dispute 
Anthropic's Mythos AI Model Sparks Emergency Cybersecurity Meeting With Top U.S. Bank CEOs 
Pilots Fear Retaliation for Refusing Middle East Flights Amid Ongoing Conflict 
Anthropic Fights Pentagon Blacklisting in Dual Federal Court Battles 
NIO ES9 SUV Launch Sends HK Shares Down 7% Despite Bold Pricing Strategy 
China Vanke Seeks Bond Extension Amid Mounting Debt Crisis 
SpaceX IPO: Retail Investors to Play Historic Role in Record-Breaking Public Offering 
Bill Ackman Eyes New Fund to Bet Against Market Complacency 
Pony.ai, Uber, and Verne Launch Europe's First Commercial Robotaxi Service in Zagreb 
Kia Cuts EV Sales Target for 2030 Amid Slowing Demand and U.S. Policy Shifts 
Lumentum Holdings Rides AI Wave With Order Book Filled Through 2028 
MINNEAPOLIS, Nov. 09, 2016 -- Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. announces that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of purchasers of Supreme Industries, Inc. (“Supreme Industries” or the “Company”) (NYSE:STS) securities during the period July 22, 2016 through October 21, 2016 (the “Class Period”).
If you are a member of the proposed Class, you may move the Court to serve as a lead plaintiff for the Class on or before January 3, 2017. You do not need to be a lead plaintiff in order to share in any recovery that may be obtained.
The Complaint alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: 1) the backlog figure from the third quarter of 2015 was a result of the timing of several large orders placed in that quarter; 2) the backlog figure for the third quarter of 2016 would not be close to the backlog figure of the third quarter of 2015; and 3) as a result, Defendants’ public statements about Supreme Industries’ business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damage.
If you purchased Supreme Industries, Inc. stock during the Class Period, or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights with respect to this matter, please contact:
Gregg M. Fishbein, Esq. ([email protected]) Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 339-6900
