Moody's Investors Service says that the Government of Maldives' B2 issuer rating and stable outlook are supported by the country's robust growth path and strong debt affordability metrics. However, a narrowly-diversified economy, high debt burden and domestic political risks represent credit constraints.
Moody's conclusions were contained in its recently-released credit analysis titled "Government of Maldives -- B2 stable: Annual Credit Analysis" and which examines the sovereign in four categories: economic strength, which is assessed as "low (+)"; institutional strength "low"; fiscal strength "low (+)"; and susceptibility to event risk "moderate (+)".
The report constitutes an annual update to investors and is not a rating action.
Moody's report points out that the expansion of Maldives' tourism sector has helped drive robust growth rates, averaging just over 5.0% between 2010 and 2015. But, dependence on a single sector also exposes the economy to considerable volatility.
The country's debt burden is significantly higher when compared with similarly rated sovereigns, with debt amounting to 63.6% of GDP in 2015. The debt burden will likely rise further, as the country embarks on several large public sector infrastructure projects that are designed to enhance the competitiveness and capabilities of the tourism sector.
The anticipated rise in debt, and the sizeable proportion of foreign currency-denominated borrowing that exposes debt servicing costs to exchange rate movements, act as fiscal constraints.
Nevertheless, debt affordability is supported by a large revenue base and funding is secured at low rates. Moreover, government liquidity risks are limited, due to a large domestic market that provides a sizable funding base.
Meanwhile, the struggle for power between political parties could adversely affect the nature and effectiveness of policies and weigh durably on tourism, investment and GDP growth.
Moody's would consider the following as credit positive for the country's sovereign rating: (1) a steady reduction in fiscal deficits and the government debt burden; (2) a successful diversification of the economy's productive base; and (3) a sustained period of political stability which encourages policy continuity and drives reform.
By contrast, the following factors would be credit negative: (1) a meaningful deterioration in fiscal and debt metrics and worsening debt affordability; (2) an escalation in domestic political tensions which hinders effective policy making or undermines growth; and (3) a shock to the tourism sector which results in a sharp fall in growth.


US Futures Rise as Investors Eye Earnings, Inflation Data, and Wildfire Impacts
U.S. Stocks vs. Bonds: Are Diverging Valuations Signaling a Shift?
Geopolitical Shocks That Could Reshape Financial Markets in 2025
China's Refining Industry Faces Major Shakeup Amid Challenges
Mexico's Undervalued Equity Market Offers Long-Term Investment Potential
Gold Prices Slide as Rate Cut Prospects Diminish; Copper Gains on China Stimulus Hopes
Trump’s "Shock and Awe" Agenda: Executive Orders from Day One
UBS Projects Mixed Market Outlook for 2025 Amid Trump Policy Uncertainty
UBS Predicts Potential Fed Rate Cut Amid Strong US Economic Data
Wall Street Analysts Weigh in on Latest NFP Data
Gold Prices Fall Amid Rate Jitters; Copper Steady as China Stimulus Eyed
Moody's Upgrades Argentina's Credit Rating Amid Economic Reforms
S&P 500 Relies on Tech for Growth in Q4 2024, Says Barclays
Stock Futures Dip as Investors Await Key Payrolls Data
Lithium Market Poised for Recovery Amid Supply Cuts and Rising Demand
US Gas Market Poised for Supercycle: Bernstein Analysts
Moldova Criticizes Russia Amid Transdniestria Energy Crisis 



